Talk:Environmental Product Declaration

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 January 2019 and 26 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Dvecheve, Dparida7.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Contested deletion

Looks like this page has been dormant for a while but requires significant improvements, I've had a quick go in my lunch break but want to come back to several sections, mainly the Challenges and the Construction Sector section. I agree that this page should not be deleted, as EPDs are increasing in popularity and are specified in several new regulations, including the US Inflation Reduction Act (specifying the use of ISO 21930) and the EU Construction Products Regulations (specifying the use of EN 15804). More and more people will be searching for information about EPDs and the wiki page should be a useful first step for those unfamiliar with the world of environmental impact reporting and emissions accounting. PutTheKettleOn (talk) 13:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

This page should not be speedy deleted because it is not simply a company, product or service, but a standardized set of procedures for quantifying the environmental impact of a product, see here. If you want me to rewrite the page then ok give me time, but I think it's worth having as several pages link to this, without referring to what it is specifically.

• Reply Please read WP:GNG, which explains the general notability guidelines here. A subject must very verifiable in reliable sources as well. Dennis Brown (talk) 12:29, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

• Reply How about this as a source then, it's from a peer reviewed paper, so should be fairly reliable: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bse.453/abstract. Orentago (talk) 12:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
• Reply I've updated the source for the article to something more credible. Can someone review the change? Orentago (talk) 09:50, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

I added a quick sentence about how EPD's are just a disclosure statement. I might work on this article for a class assignment, if that's alright? Or is it not worth it, since there was a debate about it's deletion?Rukataro (talk) 15:03, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Environmental product declaration. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304064656/http://www.en.aenor.es/aenor/certificacion/mambiente/globalepd_reconocimientos.asp to http://www.en.aenor.es/aenor/certificacion/mambiente/globalepd_reconocimientos.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:28, 24 December 2016 (UTC)