Talk:Friedrich Hayek

The fact that there is no criticism section of Hayek is concerning

This page seems to be biased based on the opinions of a few editors as there seems to be a over playing of Hayek importance in economics and that his works have probably more critics than supporters in the academic world. He has a lot of critics and failure to mention these is a huge issue. Especially since pretty much every other page about economists mention the critics. The fact is there is a very well know debate between Keynes and Hayek where Keynes completely destroyed Hayek theory of the business cycle. There is mention of this is a small part of the life section. But it’s so minor. The fact that there is a whole section of praise but lack of a section of the massive amount of criticism of Hayek is concerning as people who don’t know that Hayek is only revered in right wing and libertarian economic circles will think Hayek is more important to the field than he actually was 72.177.245.124 (talk) 16:23, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

I have noticed one thing here- those users who accuse other editors of wikipedia as biased are themselves the most biased ones. You can add a criticism section here if you have relevant secondary sources, nobody is stopping you! 202.168.84.67 (talk) 21:10, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Agreed. Furthermore, apparently his theory of constraints and how that creates values (for the consumer and working class) doesn’t apply to the wealthy who are the legislators of value! Irony! Murielgh (talk) 01:48, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Do you have any reliable sources regarding criticism of Hayek? X-Editor (talk) 04:39, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Hayek- Hebb doesn’t belong

It’s a neuronal network topic. Not the same Hayek 71.34.109.136 (talk) 09:08, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

removing – S. Rich (talk) 03:11, 21 September 2024 (UTC)