Talk:Ghaziabad
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ghaziabad article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months  |
 | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CityMayors Survey Link
editThe Ghaziabad city is ranked 2 in the fastest growing cities between 2006 and 2020 by CityMayors and the link is http://www.citymayors.com/statistics/urban_growth1.html. I could not add citation for this link, please someone else can do this for us.
Thanks, Deepak
Semi-protected edit request on 2 January 2019
edit | This edit request to Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. DannyS712 (talk) 17:35, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Requested move 10 September 2019
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved. No opposition, and seems reasonable. — Amakuru (talk) 14:35, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
– Clearly WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. In Google Books search for "Ghaziabad", all results returned are for Uttar Pradesh's Ghaziabad. No results for Ghaziabad District, Kunar or Ghaziabad, Karachi could be found there. Also on Google search, and Google News, when "Ghaziabad" is searched, all of the results returned are for Uttar Pradesh's Ghaziabad. Even if the disambiguator "Uttar Pradesh" with this title was meant to be used to difference this topic from Ghaziabad district, Uttar Pradesh, then it does not disambiguate at all, because the city and the district named after it, both, are located in Uttar Pradesh. Khestwol (talk) 10:42, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Merge from Draft: Raj Nagar (District)
editMerged content from Draft: Raj Nagar (District) to here. See Talk: Ghaziabad. Aaryangupta23 (talk) 19:26, 27 December 2019 (UTC)
I propose to merge Ghaziabad district, Uttar Pradesh into Ghaziabad. I think that the content in the Ghaziabad district, Uttar Pradesh article can easily be explained in the context of Ghaziabad, and the Ghaziabad article is of a reasonable size that the merging of Ghaziabad district, Uttar Pradesh will not cause any problems as far as article size is concerned. Aaryangupta23 (talk) 18:55, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
@Aaryangupta23: hi! I propose that the pages remain different, since there are many city pages across wikipedia, as well as district pages which are expected to contain different kinds of information (the district being administered by district admin (state govt), city by municipal admin (city/local govt).
City versus District information
editThe demographic data (on religions) is about the district and not the city. Please note that district related information must be on the district page [1] and not here. Nagarpedian (talk) 05:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)