Talk:Giuseppe Calò

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Surprise verdict?

edit

The Calvi article simply says "The verdict was a surprise to some observers." That seems sufficiently plausible and uncontroversial to require no citation. But to omit the 'some observers' qualifier would seem to require a reliable source. The cited BBC sources makes no mention of surprise, and I can't check the cited Times source as I'm not prepared to pay Rupert Murdoch for the privilege of trying to verify Wikipedia citations. So I'm now going to put "citation needed" beside 'surprise' in the two places where it currently occurs in the hope that somebody can find a more satisfactory citation, or can add the actual words used about it being a surprise as a quote in the Times citation, or can fix it in some other way. Tlhslobus (talk) 09:34, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Resolved. - DonCalo (talk) 13:00, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Giuseppe Calò. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 18 October 2017 (UTC)Reply