 | A fact from Gwalior Fort appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 November 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
_without_national_boundaries.svg)
better photo for this article
editBetter photos for this article can be sourced from http://mea.gov.in/indiaperspective/2008/01200901.pdf, page 26. The website is a goverment of India website and hence should be free from copyright issues —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kedar Borhade (talk • contribs) 11:16, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- Government of India does not release all its iste contents in public domain like USA. The images need to be checked for copyright. --Redtigerxyz Talk 06:51, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Sources
editSome of the text duplicates this.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 21:12, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Dynastic lists
editThe article contains a number of dynastic lists which seem out of place in an article about a structure. I propose to delete them and replace a short summary when necessary. Any thoughts or objections? Rsloch (talk) 13:08, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Major historical resource on the web
editThe Gwalior fort was a major Jain center for a long period. For a Hindi article by Ramjit Jain see: http://hindi.webdunia.com/religion/religion/jainism/0708/11/1070811030_1.htm http://hindi.webdunia.com/religion/religion/jainism/0708/11/1070811031_1.htm http://hindi.webdunia.com/religion/religion/jainism/0708/11/1070811032_1.htm http://hindi.webdunia.com/religion/religion/jainism/0708/11/1070811033_1.htm http://hindi.webdunia.com/religion/religion/jainism/0708/11/1070811034_1.htm http://hindi.webdunia.com/religion/religion/jainism/0708/11/1070811035_1.htm http://hindi.webdunia.com/religion/religion/jainism/0708/11/1070811046_1.htm http://hindi.webdunia.com/religion/religion/jainism/0708/11/1070811047_1.htm http://hindi.webdunia.com/religion/religion/jainism/0708/11/1070811048_1.htm http://hindi.webdunia.com/religion/religion/jainism/0708/11/1070811049_1.htm
It includes text of several major inscriptions. Malaiya (talk)
Copy edit
editI've done a copy edit of this so I'll leave it a while to see if there are other suggestions. Kind regards, Myrtle. Myrtlegroggins (talk) 06:22, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Factual accuracy
editThis article needs better sources and more inline sources. There have been a slew of changes to numbers, dates, and other items in this article. Same issue is happening at Gwalior. I do have concerns about a block evasion/vandalism etc. But it is difficult to tell what is accurate at this point. --Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 07:19, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Recent reverts
edit@Donchocolate: What is up with your recent reverts, you leave no WP:EDITSUMMARY, disruptively revert multiple times and are on the verge of breaching WP:3RR. The edits only pertain basic WP:MOS cleanup it makes no sense to revert them. Explain, an WP:ANI report is coming otherwise. Gotitbro (talk) 08:10, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- You also not leaving any summary. Just editing without leaving any refrence. Can you please explain why did you remove the refrence 2 from the page. If you can't provide summary edit then you might get blocked Donchocolate (talk) 08:13, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
- Please learn the difference between an WP:EDITSUMMARY and WP:CITATION. And that reference was an WP:EXTERNALLINK which should not be in articles and that [Gopagiri] also pertains to the name of the hill not the fort and is better suited for the body and not the WP:LEAD. I will restore it as a citation and name in the etymology section. Please read WP:MOS and Wikipedia:Competence is required.
- And be wary of further reverts that is a blockable breach of WP:3RR. Gotitbro (talk) 08:20, 3 October 2024 (UTC)