This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Not only was there nothing in the lit about an excavation, Hadji Muhammed was only even mentioned once or twice. I wonder if this even should be a standalone article.Ploversegg (talk) 04:03, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Wikidata has this source on a 1937-1939 excavation: Roux, Georges (1992). Ancient Iraq. London. ISBN0-14-193825-0. OCLC1052118729.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link). I have no doubt that the site/excavation are real, but I agree that information is hard to come by. For example, Oates, Joan (1960). "Ur and Eridu, the Prehistory". Iraq. 22: 32–50. doi:10.2307/4199667. ISSN0021-0889. compares the material from Eridu directly with that of the "type site Hajji Muhammad" but unfortunately no links are given. Might well be that the original excavation report was never published. Zoeperkoe (talk) 09:01, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply