Talk:Honeywell Aerospace Technologies

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Aircraft / Engines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

Companies C‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

C This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

United States: Arizona Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arizona portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Aviation C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force

New Draft

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I have a paid COI with Honeywell, who I'm helping improve this article in compliance with Wikipedia's policies and ethical best practices for a paid COI. See my disclosure here. I wanted to let anyone watching this article I'm working on a draft Honeywell Aerospace article here and to invite neutral editors to review, edit, or comment on the draft. In accordance to what I believe to be ethical best practices for a paid COI, I will only be asking a neutral editor to implement these changes on my behalf, such as is done with the {{request edit}} process, if they feel the edits are an improvement to the article.

I've made similar Talk page notes on the articles on Avionics and NextGen.

Corporate (talk) 22:39, 6 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

{{Request edit}}

I've completed my draft here and would like to request an impartial editor move it into article-space if they find the article acceptable. Corporate 15:26, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Request handled by User:Pol430 (see diff here). I've also added a connected contributors tag. Corporate 20:19, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Unproven Claim

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In the first paragraph of this article is a claim that Honeywell is the largest producer of avionics/engines. This is not well substantiated, largest producer in Phoenix, Texas, USA, the World? Where needs to be properly defined. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.11.160.10 (talk) 13:00, 13 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Honeywell Aerospace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110521191548/http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2004/01/13/176266/honeywell-gives-as907-turbofan-redesignation.html to http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2004/01/13/176266/honeywell-gives-as907-turbofan-redesignation.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Honeywell Aerospace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 4 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Honeywell Aerospace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:55, 6 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Footnotes 11 and 24 are duplicates and don't support what they're cited to support

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

At the time I'm typing this, Footnote 11 and Footnote 24 go to EXACTLY the same URL at the Los Angeles Times. Furthermore, Footnote 11 exists to support the claim that the purchase price was $1.025 billion, while footnote 24 exists to support the claim that the purchase price was $1.029 billion. It can't be both, right? The LA Times article says $1.025 billion. That LA Times article itself is not well-written, because it says also "other estimates of its price were closer to $800 million". Why would the LA Times refer to these ESTIMATES when Unisys's own official announcement says "$1.025 billion"? A GOOD newspaper might have included the text "other estimates of its price HAD BEEN closer to $800 million" to make it clear that the statement refers not to the sales-price but to earlier, now-superseded GUESSES as to the sales-price.2600:1700:6759:B000:E894:BFCC:705D:880 (talk) 20:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)Christopher Lawrence SimpsonReply

Add topic

Talk:Honeywell Aerospace Technologies

Contents

New Draft

Unproven Claim

External links modified

External links modified

External links modified

Footnotes 11 and 24 are duplicates and don't support what they're cited to support

zproxy.org