Talk:Hypernasal speech

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified


Sourcing

edit

Please prefer sources in English when possible, see WP:NONENG. I see little reason to use so many Dutch sources here. Try searching Google Books for "Hypernasal speech". (talk) 19:13, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

English usage does seem inconsistent. Hypernasality or Hypernasal resonance crop up on pubmed. I put the former in the infobox. If no-one objects, I'd switch the cites to use the usual diberri format for medical articles.LeadSongDog come howl! 22:09, 27 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Merge Nasality

edit

Hypernasal speech and Nasality (disorder) appear to describe the same thing, so the articles should be merged. jnestorius(talk) 11:38, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hypernasal speech. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply