Talk:Indicazione geografica tipica
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
editThis article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 13:05, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Most certainly worse than DOC or not?
editThis article makes an IGT look like a good product, yet DOC states that altogether too many products have at some point gotten DOC certificates, and hence may not be all too wonderful. Is the quality of a DOC most certainly better than an IGT from the same region and grapes, generally so, not necessarily, or not at all as this is not a clear grades system???
Merge with DOC/DOCG article and rename?
editHi, I've reworked the Denominazione di origine controllata article to be clearer, and updated it to better discuss the 2008-11 EU wine labelling reforms (PDO/PGI). I've included the gist of this article in it, and updated the references. I think it would be useful to make this a redirect to the IGT section, and perhaps rename the article to "Italian wine classifications" or similar. Thoughts? Jon (talk) 12:16, 24 September 2019 (UTC)