Talk:Ingush people
| This is the talk page for discussing Ingush people and anything related to its purposes and tasks. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 6 months  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Population
editHello, @WikiEditor1234567123:. I'd abstain from using that source considering the fact that the author makes a very dubious claim about Ingush being 200,000 individuals in the European union alone, not to mention the 350,000 in ME which I find highly unlikely. This raises questions regarding the reliability of the source. What research is she using and where did she get this demographic? Actual RS estimate that there is around 200,000 Russian-origin muslims in Europe, of which 130,000 are Chechens. The demographic you are citing is an unbelievably high number.Ola Tønningsberg (talk) 22:24, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Albogachieva is an authoritative scientist, other scientists refer to her, she has many scientific publications in reputable publications. The work "Islam in Ingushetia" came out under the patronage of a serious well-known (in the World) scientific institution "Russian Academy of Sciences". The source is reliable and there's no debate about that, if you have reliable sources that mention other estimates of Ingush population, then we can add them alongside Albogachieva source. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 15:34, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Ethnonym "Loamaro"
editAssalamu aleikum @WikiEditor1234567123, I've removed "Loamaro" from the enthnonym section as it is not longer used today, however I've just noticed that the article does not mention this ethnonym elsewhere, although it is still relevant, I am still unsure if it should stay in the section? What do you think? Muqale (talk) 09:39, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Wa alaikum assalam. Even if the ethnonym isn't used anymore, we can mention that it was an historical ethnonym. It deserves a place in the section, but I will try to make it happen later. WikiEditor1234567123 (talk) 13:29, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
- Ok. Then perhaps, it is sifgnificant to have it. My first tought was to not make this section unnecessarily long, because it should give first time readers more clear information about the Ingush people, too many ethnonyms can be confusing. Muqale (talk) 14:26, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 July 2024
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Hello, the change I would like to be added is clarification on the part where Ingush history related to The Alan state. It’s not mentioned that Alania was a nation created by the Alans. (Porto-Ossetians) of Iranic decent related to the Scythians and Sarmatians who held the majority population numbers in Alania (Alans), and had the Alanian culture. I’d like this change to be added because it’s possible to confuse the Alan state as a state of Ingush origin, of Ingush significancy, and or of Ingush culture. So by writing that it’s simply a “diverse” state, or “mixed” is a way spread potential mis information to history enjoyers around the world who choose Wikipedia everyday! Michael Argen (talk) 18:39, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. – Isochrone (talk) 12:57, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
