Talk:Isotopes of xenon

Latest comment: 10 months ago by Cristiano Toàn in topic Alpha decay energies of isotopes of xenon

Why is Xenon-108 not on the table?

edit

Why does the table begin at 110Xe instead of 108Xe? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balgontork (talkcontribs) 13:37, 20 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Isotopes of xenon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:09, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Isotopes of xenon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:23, 15 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Xenon 124 decay

edit

The article says that Xenon 124 is stable, but [this report] says that they just saw one decay. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 19:33, 24 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

It is one of isotopes subject to Double beta decay. Ruslik_Zero 20:23, 24 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
The article does not actually say that it is stable. It says that it is "observationally stable" with a note. Ruslik_Zero 20:27, 24 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Bubba73 and Ruslik0: That new article is correct; the decay of 124Xe was indeed observed for the first time and is documented in [1] (abstract only for now). I updated the isotopes list, templates, and article with this information. Thank you for pointing this out, Bubba73. ComplexRational (talk) 23:00, 24 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
@ComplexRational: We should probably also update the tables in Primordial nuclide and List of nuclides to include 124Xe as unstable, too. (I have made a start on the former, along with some other articles which counted the number of stable nuclides.) Double sharp (talk) 05:22, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "Observation of two-neutrino double electron capture in 124Xe with XENON1T". Nature. 568 (7753): 532–535. 2019. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1124-4.

Wiki Education assignment: Planetary Atmospheres

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 March 2022 and 10 June 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): DanqiuChen (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Carleydf (talk) 17:35, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Alpha decay energies of isotopes of xenon

edit
Isotope N Alpha decay energy (MeV)
110Xe 56 3.8906
111Xe 57 3.7136
112Xe 58 3.3317
113Xe 59 3.0895
114Xe 60 2.7635
115Xe 61 2.4039
116Xe 62 1.8329
117Xe 63 1.7379
118Xe 64 1.3840
119Xe 65 0.8456
120Xe 66 0.6714
121Xe 67 0.1991
122Xe 68 -0.0589
123Xe 69 -0.4893
124Xe 70 -0.6802
125Xe 71 -1.0654
126Xe 72 -1.2791
127Xe 73 -1.5735
128Xe 74 -1.7604
129Xe 75 -2.1001
130Xe 76 -2.2421
131Xe 77 -2.5590
132Xe 78 -2.7133
133Xe 79 -3.0653
134Xe 80 -3.1980
135Xe 81 -3.6330
136Xe 82 -3.6675
137Xe 83 -1.8595
138Xe 84 -0.0207
139Xe 85 -0.2424
140Xe 86 -0.9904
141Xe 87 -1.1860
142Xe 88 -1.9685
143Xe 89 -2.0709
144Xe 90 -2.7416
145Xe 91 -2.9652
146Xe 92 -3.6638

129.104.241.214 (talk) 15:32, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Cristiano Toàn (talk) 12:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC) 134Xe is engergically allowed to undergo double beta decay. However it decay energy is relative low 0.825 MeV. By comparison 136Xe's double beta decay has energy 2.462 MeV and have life 2.38x10^21 years Cristiano Toàn (talk) 08:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC) 136Xe is the most neutron rich for nuclide contains 75 protons or lessReply