Talk:Jennifer Lawrence/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 16:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

I'll have this done by tomorrow. JAGUAR  16:28, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

I look forward to it :) Snuggums (talk / edits) 16:53, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   It is well referenced.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Initial comments

• "Lawrence is known in the media for being a vocal advocate of feminism and gender equality" - might be beneficial to link Feminism here (or Feminism in the United States, or even another one of the articles related to it)
• "She is the youngest woman to accrue four Academy Award nominations" - the lead says she is the youngest woman, whereas the "2014–present: Established actress" section states she is the youngest person
• "She then appeared in The Beaver, a black comedy directed by Jodie Foster" - was this film released in 2011?
• "The Devil You Know, a small-scale feature that Lawrence had filmed for back in 2005 was her first release of 2013" - feature film?
• "In 2013, Time magazine named her one of the most 100 influential people in the world" - Time is already linked before, so de-link it here
• " In 2015. Lawrence was named "Entertainer of the Year" by Entertainment Weekly—a title she won also in 2012" - a title she also won in 2012
• "She has also won a BAFTA Award for..." - BAFTA is always used without the "award" after it
• Ref 80 and ref 126 are dead
• Is AskMen a reliable source? I wouldn't know because I don't review film articles as much as I used to!

There was a discussion about it on the article's talk. I added that it just has an opinion about how sexy certain women are so I think it is fine. I also had no problem about it in my other FAs, so..

I done a full review of this but couldn't find many issues to raise. The article is well written, comprehensive, and all of the sources check out. I found a couple of dead links, but other than that there were no issues with venerability. Excellent work! I'll leave this on hold until all of the above are clarified. JAGUAR  19:06, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, Jaguar. I have addressed your concerns. – FrB.TG (talk) 20:03, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Did some of the others. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Yup, I should have said "we". :) FrB.TG (talk) 20:23, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you both! By all means, let's promote this. It well and truly meets the criteria, as evidenced by my short and lacklustre review LOL. I also want to congratulate you on the work, definitely FA material. JAGUAR  23:02, 6 December 2016 (UTC)