Talk:Jensen FF
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Number of gears
editSomeone has entered to the info box that the car had a four speed automatic. According to my source it had a three speed automatic. I've not changed the entry because I am not sufficiently confident in my source. But does anyone have access to anything on this? With that size of engine, I think a four speed automatic would have been a bit unusual at this time, but I'm not an expert of big old Chrysler engines. Regards Charles01 (talk) 19:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- This page says 3 speed TorqueFlite http://www.jensenff.co.uk./page3.html for Mk1 is there other marks and does thjose have same box? --— Typ932T | C 20:09, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- I thought MkI was the only mark, but this was only from memory and I was wrong (so long as my interpretation of Italian wiki is right). There were a few prototypes with the four wheel drive system from the earlier body shape, but I don't know if any were commercialised. If it was still on Mk I in 1969 (which is implied tho NOT stated in the extract to which you direct me), then logically it would also have been on Mk I in 1966 (the date of my source). Italian Wiki thinks Mk I ran 1966 to 1968, Mk II 1969 - 1971. BUT Italian wiki merges the Inteceptor and the FF into a single article: which makes perfectly good sense. It's just the English and German wiki give them separate pages. So the information is powerfully persuasive that the automatic box was THREE speed but I guess not yet quite conclusive. Still, I think it's moving that way...
- Speculation: I think the most likely is that for the Interceptor (as with the precious model) there could have been advertised a choice between a three speed automatic and a four speed manual, but they were mostly sold to Americans who don't like a stick shift in a big car. So in practice almost all all Interceptors went to US with a three speed Chrysler torqueflit box. Ditto the few FFs that actually found customers But that's speculation
- Regards Charles01 (talk) 20:36, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
- Further reflection: If it was a Torqueflite system to go with the Chrysler engine - and I think it was - it must have been a 3 speed. Torqueflite is a three speed system. Charles01 (talk) 07:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- I think it must 3 speed Torqueflite A-727, torqueflite page says 4 speed was introduced in 1989 --— Typ932T | C 08:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- Further reflection: If it was a Torqueflite system to go with the Chrysler engine - and I think it was - it must have been a 3 speed. Torqueflite is a three speed system. Charles01 (talk) 07:10, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
The image
editDoes the image show an FF or an Interceptor? Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:20, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- Reading the styling notes, I see that the image is indeed an FF. Perhaps the file name should be changed? I have removed the photo request notice. Maury Markowitz (talk) 15:24, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Jensen FF. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050909195212/http://home.online.no/~s-espe/stein/jensen/jindexen.htm to http://home.online.no/~s-espe/stein/jensen/jindexen.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:01, 21 April 2017 (UTC)