Talk:John Lennox

Latest comment: 11 months ago by 78.57.221.177 in topic Is It Legal to...

Untitled

edit

Some text is verbally taken from John Lennox's personal home page. Has he authorized the use of his content? An example is the academic section further up (about his various stations) which is the same as the about section on his web site. 84.61.181.207 (talk) 23:30, 9 November 2009 (UTC)Reply



edit

Can someone check if this link is broken? I can't seem to get to it. The Dawkins-Lennox debate: http://www.dawkinslennoxdebate.com/. It's on YouTube, however: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VRPSsKIOOoQ&feature=related (in 10 parts; this link goes to the first of the 10). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bill the Cat 7 (talkcontribs) 20:02, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Never mind. I checked it again today and it's working. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bill the Cat 7 (talkcontribs) 17:39, 5 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit

You can download the Hitchens/Lennox debate (in 3 .rar parts) here: http://atheistmovies.blogspot.com/2009/11/can-atheism-save-europe-christopher.html

I'm concerned, however, if it is legal to post this link on WP. Can someone please let me know? Thanks. Bill the Cat 7 (talk) 05:50, 6 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Why would you be worried about legality? 98.198.83.12 (talk) 20:26, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
I see what you did there - because under atheism there is no objective right or wrong. There is only subjective right or wrong, so abusing a little child is no different from being Mother Teresa - it is just a matter of "taste". Nice one ;) 101.183.21.131 (talk) 08:49, 7 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
in fact, abusing children IS NO DIFFRENT from being 'mother' theresa Public_image_of_Mother_Teresa#Quality_of_medical_care 78.57.221.177 (talk) 78.57.221.177 (talk) 20:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

where does John Lennox fellowship

edit

Definitely not with the Plymouth Brethren as popularly thought. Please see [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Another_berean

DPhil

edit
Lennox obtained an M.A. and DPhil. degree at the University of Cambridge.

No, he didn't. Cambridge doesn't award the DPhil. Can we have a source on this? Marnanel (talk) 05:50, 16 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Religious Beliefs?

edit

I think Professor John Lennox is an avowed Christian, yet there is no mention of this on his page, and he recently contributed to 'The God Debate' at the Oxford Union at which he expressed his views in God and Judaeo-Christian beliefs TheBlackWhirlwind (talk) 16:37, 1 January 2013 (UTC) TheBlackWhirlwind.Reply

What do you mean? In the opening paragraph it says "and a Christian apologist" 2001:8003:6A23:2C00:64D7:75A1:AB54:B3BE (talk) 08:45, 7 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

DOB?

edit

I realize that BLP's often omit a specific birthdate, but the year of birth is generally listed. Do we have no information on Lennox's age at all? Joefromrandb (talk) 08:56, 19 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Career as mathematician

edit

If nothing else, surely Professor Lennox is a mathematician, and a distinguished one at that. His Wikipedia is consumed with his Christianity. Can something be added, somewhere, of his secular achievements? Please? The one informs the other, if only a little.

Agreed. The guy is obviously a genius and it would be good if something could be written of his secular achievements 101.183.21.131 (talk) 08:47, 7 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
I also agree with you. Albeit Lennox is more popular for his apologetic works about science and religion, he has also a wide career as a mathematician, which is not mentioned in the article. I'll try to investigate more about it in order to edit the wiki page with the references needed when I have time.LiamTorres1017 (talk) 02:46, 7 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
I agree his maths career needs mentioning. However, I now feel the lede section has swung too far in the other direction. 99% of the article and all the sources are about his apologetics career. This is as it should be because that is what he is notable for. However, the lede is mostly about his maths career, giving the wrong impression of his notability. 85.149.13.48 (talk) 14:32, 18 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on John Lennox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:52, 25 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on John Lennox. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:32, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply