Talk:LLA Azteca Championship
Latest comment: 5 years ago by MWright96 in topic GA Review
LLA Azteca Championship has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
LLA Azteca Championship is the main article in the LLA Azteca Champions and challengers series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the LLA Azteca Championship article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:LLA Azteca Championship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 15:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
Going to review this entry. MWright96 (talk) 15:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Infobox
edit- Use the plainlist template in the promotion field of the infobox so that CMLL and LLA appear in a unbulleted list
Lead
edit- "It was sponsored by TV Azteca Noreste, that televised all championship matches" - who
- "as it changed hands each time LLA/ CMLL promoted a title match." - LLA and CMLL
- "who was born in 1991 and won the title in September 2012 making him 19 or 20 years old at the time." - If Mistico was born in 1991, he would have been 20 or 21 when he won the title, correct?
Background
edit- "that are used in the storylines presented on their shows, they are not won as result" - the comma should be replaced by a semi-colom
- "but the outcome of the matches are pre-determined by their promoters." - better: but their outcome are pre-determined by promoters.
- "The championship is represented by a belt for the champion to wear" - incumbent holder
- "and by 2009 it was decided to create the "Azteca Championship" - and by 2009, had deided to create the "Azteca Championship",
- The entire second background is lacking reliable source(s)
History
edit- "The Azteca Championship was created in late 2009 with a one-night tournament" - as
- "with two six-man tag team matches to reduce the field from 12 to 6." - 12 to 6 wrestlers
- "The semi-final match was a torneo cibernetico elimination match" - event
- "with three wrestlers in the ring at the same time." - concurrently.
- "who was born in 1991 and won the title in September 2012 making him 19 or 20 years old at the time." - same issue as the third query in the lede
- "The last champions was Místico," - champion
Title history
edit- Monterrey, Nuevo León should be wikilinked the first time it is mentioned, not the sixth
Champion age at title win, youngest to oldest
edit- "Místico: 19–20 years" - same query as the third one in the lede and the fifth one in the history section
References
edit- References 3, 15 and 17 are lacking access dates
That is all of the queries I have. Going to put the review on hold. MWright96 (talk) 16:04, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- MWright96 - thank you for the prompt review. I believe I have addressed all issues except sourcing the second paragraph in "background", I will do some research on that now. MPJ-DK (talk) 16:38, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- MWright96 I looked around for where I found the unsourced "background" section and it does not appear to be a reliable source, so I rewrote it and added a source. I hope that works? and I believe I've addressed all the issues now?? MPJ-DK (talk) 00:00, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- @MPJ-DK: Now promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 09:49, 28 February 2019 (UTC)