Talk:Latakia

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Kaislash in topic Jules Jammal School
Former good articleLatakia was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 24, 2009Good article nomineeListed
November 22, 2014Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Pronunciation?

edit

Yes, how do we say it in ENGLISH? Which syllable is stressed? 2nd or 3rd?

Untitled

edit

According to Microsoft Word, "refounded" is not a word.

The site, on the Ras Ziyarah peninsula, has been occupied for a long time. The Phoenicians had a city here named Ramitha, and to the Greeks it was Leuke Akte, then it was refounded and named Laodicea by Seleucus I Nicator, after his mother. It became an important port and an exporter of wine produced in the hills behind the city (Strabo 16.2.9). An arch from the time of Septimius Severus has survived.

Rebuild? Founded again? Something else?

[EDIT] - Ahh got it, edited it to re-founded, just needs a hyphen.

Unsourced statement about Alawization by Hafez al Asaad

edit

"Latakia was historically a Sunni city, however the Alawatization process under Hafez al Asaad led to many Alawites moving from the rural hinterland into the city." Sounds like a serious charge/statement against a polital opponent should at least have a good source for that? Presuming the claim is undisputed. 83.84.100.133 (talk) 18:22, 12 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Pronunciation?

edit

Could we have some help here how to pronounce Latakia in English -- the city and the tobacco (if different)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.237.249.175 (talk) 12:57, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Photos

edit

Do we really need two photos of the arch right next to each other? Maybe some of the photos could moved down to a gallery section... AnonMoos 13:58, 20 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

To-do list

edit
  •   Done - Expand "Etymology" section.
  • Expand the "Ancient settlement and founding" and "Modern era" sections by just a passage more of info. They're all satisfactory right now, but a little more info would be even more helpful.
  •   Done - Start a Geography section with info about what Latakia is situated on and its immediate surroundings.
  • Latakia doesn't have an "Old City", but something on the city center, subdivisions, etc. should be mentioned in a subsection.
  •   Done - Start a Climate subsection with a table, as standard.
  •   Done - Start a "Sports" subsection.
  • Start a "Museums" subsection.
  • Slightly expand "Economy" section.
  • Find the recent-most population of Latakia. (Lonely Planet says 354,000 in 2008, but this is pretty much the same as the 1994 estimate. We got 402,000 from 2002.)
  • Start a section on the local government.
  • Mention the current mayor of the city.
  • If there is any other cultural aspect of the city worthy of note, it should be mentioned in the article.
  • Create an informative, but concise lead.

--Al Ameer son (talk) 04:43, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Editing questions:

  • Throughout the article, we need to choose whether to use "October War of 1973" or "Yom Kippur War" for the name of the conflict.

--More to be posted later, if found. SpencerT♦Nominate! 21:54, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Etymology

edit

The Seleucid dynasty of Macedonian-Greek rulers had four "dynastic" names which they used to name almost all the cities which they founded or re-founded or significantly changed the institutions of: Antiokheia (Antioch), Seleuceia, Laodicea, and Apamea (even Jerusalem was called "Antioch" by some for a time). Not sure there's too much more to say... AnonMoos (talk) 08:01, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Population

edit

I haven't seen any sources list the population in the 500,000s. This book lists a population of 400,000[1], as does this one[2]. Lonely Planet says 354,000[3] Which one are we using for the current population? --Al Ameer son (talk) 01:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Latakia/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 16:57, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Initial comments

edit

On a quick read through, this article appears to be at or about GA-level. I'll therefore continue the review, going through the article section by section, but leaving the WP:Lead until last. Pyrotec (talk) 18:26, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Overall summary

edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


A wide-ranging, well-illustrated article, of GA-standard.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

A good Good-Article. Congratulations on the quality of the article. Its now a GA.Pyrotec (talk) 21:18, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wow, I'll tell Yazan and Spencer the good news. Thanks for the review! --Al Ameer son (talk) 21:36, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

news

edit

it's under attack going on right now. --Ujaj35 (talk) 15:38, 15 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Post card of a group of Alawite musicians from North-Western Syria, (1920's). .jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Post card of a group of Alawite musicians from North-Western Syria, (1920's). .jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests December 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:49, 10 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Russian spy facility

edit

"Latakia is the home of Russia's largest foreign electronic eavesdropping facility". What's the name of this base? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:33, 6 May 2013 (UTC)Reply


edit
 

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Mkativerata (talk) 09:57, 22 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

It's a shame this article had to be slaughtered. I'm going to begin reinstating information that was deleted as a result of the copy-vio in line with our copyright guidelines. Please verify as needed. --Al Ameer (talk) 20:45, 17 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Timeline of Latakia

edit

What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content! Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 16:52, 17 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Latakia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:07, 17 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal

edit

I propose that Laodicea in Syria be merged into Latakia. This is the same city (not a separate archaeological site), also called Laodicea ad Mare under the Seleucids, and habitation in that area has been continuous. It makes little sense to fork out each history epoch into its own stub. The information could be added to the history section of the current article. Yazan (talk) 20:49, 17 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

There are many cases where we have separate articles for the same city in the two periods: Berytus/Beirut, Londinium/London, Mediolanum/Milan, Jicheng (Beijing)/Yanjing/Dadu/Beijing, Batavia, Dutch East Indies/Jakarta, Tenochtitlan/Mexico City. In other cases, the content is divided differently: Rome/History of Rome, Trier/History of Trier (Augusta Treverorum redirects to History of Trier#Roman Empire).
The main criterion for having two articles seem to be:
  1. Keeping the main article from getting too long.
  2. A clear or radical break in culture or dynasty.
In the case of Latakia, the main article is quite long, and there is a clear change from the Roman/Byzantine period to the Islamic period. So the current division seems reasonable.
But there is room for improving our criteria for cases like this in general. --Macrakis (talk) 21:24, 17 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hmm. I understand the rationale behind having a separate article sometimes, but my contention is that I doubt that this applies in the case of Latakia.
  1. I don't believe an article strictly on Roman Laodicea can be improved much on its own
  2. I disagree about the radical break (especially in Hellenistic -> Roman transition)
I think a better argument could be made to change the scope of the article to cover the Hellenistic/Roman period until the Islamic conquest.
As it stands now it's a bit of a mess, as Laodicea ad Mare redirects to Latakia, while arguably it was the city's most flourishing era, while Laodicea in Syria hardly ever links to the current city. That's why I proposed to merge what's in Laodicea in Syria into the Latakia article until such moment when it can be more properly/systematically expanded. Yazan (talk) 13:57, 18 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
I agree. The Roman/Islamic line is probably the right place to split the article, with content about Laodicea ad Mare merged into Laodicea in Syria. --Macrakis (talk) 17:37, 18 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Latakia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:09, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Latakia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:52, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Arabic Pronunciation

edit

[el.laːdˈʔɪjje] is the pronunciation in Damascus Levantine Arabic, [al.laːðˈqɪjja] is its pronounciation in MSA, I feel that the pronounciation in Latakia Levantine Arabic should be added too (although there are multiple different sub-dialects within the city). Maybe something like [el.laːtˈqɪjje], I'm not gonna add it to the page cause I'm not too good with IPA but that's how I pronounce it (I am from Latakia). Kaislash (talk) 09:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Jules Jammal School

edit

The school's original building has been closed for renovations for many years now, with the students and teachers moving to Yusuf al-Azama temporarily. This could be noteworthy. Kaislash (talk) 10:35, 3 August 2024 (UTC)Reply