Talk:Law & Order season 20

Latest comment: 2 months ago by 2601:541:D00:E6D0:C1AE:6165:84C8:F533 in topic First sentence

Name

edit

Shoudn't the name of the article be named Law & Order (Season 20)NoD'ohnuts (talk) 01:54, 12 April 2010 (UTC)NoD'ohnutsReply

BLGM7,

Why was there a primteimte gap in which three more episodes were added? Because of the conflict between 2010 Tonight Show conflict? No. Affiliates were dissatisfied with The Jay Leno Show, and so NBC decided to move it to 11:35 pm. This was the cause of the gap and resulted with three more episodes of L&O being added.

The 2010 Tonight Show conflict was caused by NBC wanting to move Leno into the 11:35 pm timeslot and slide O'Brien's show back one-half hour. O'Brien refused to move from the 11:35 pm timeslot, thereby causing the conflict between completing shows to fill the 11:35 pm timeslot.

The 2010 Tonight Show conflict did not "cause" the gap. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Television fan (talkcontribs) 15:38, 4 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Law & Order Season 20.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:Law & Order Season 20.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 31 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:59, 31 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Law & Order (season 20). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Law & Order (season 20). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:29, 3 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

First sentence

edit

The first sentence is wack. 2601:541:D00:E6D0:C1AE:6165:84C8:F533 (talk) 11:13, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply