Talk:Lituites

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cephalopods, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CephalopodsWikipedia:WikiProject CephalopodsTemplate:WikiProject CephalopodsCephalopods articles

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Would much like to know how this species relates to the genus Trilacinoceras. Picture at nautiloid looks just like a Lituites. --DanielCD 21:43, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

identical images, different labels

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Identical photos on this page, labeled Lituites, and under Nautiloid, where it's labeled Trilacinoceras. There is no other mention of Trilacinoceras within the text of either article, nor does Trilacinoceras have its own article. To the uneducated reader (like myself) this is confusing. Was Trilacinoceras a species of the genus Lituites? If so, please specify the label in the Lituites article. If not, one of them seems to have been mislabeled. ---Sluzzelin 04:59, 30 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

Talk:Lituites

identical images, different labels

zproxy.org