Talk:Makauwahi Cave
 | A fact from Makauwahi Cave appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 March 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
geological contradiction?
editThis article states that its subject cave is a limestone cave, although the linked articles state that the whole island is volcanic in origin. What's limestone (sedimentary) doing on a volcano? If true, this needs to be explained; if incorrect, it should be corrected. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 16:26, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- My understanding (and I am not a geologist) is that there is no contradiction. Check eolianite and calcarenite. The 'sedimentary' (largely wind- rather than water-deposited) substrate could have been calcareous coastal dunes, lithified (maybe during lower sea levels in the last, or a previous, ice age) by weakly acidic rainfall. The cave is right next to the beach, after all. If anybody has a better explanation, please let us know. Maias (talk) 01:08, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Makauwahi Cave. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100106072459/http://www.usbg.gov/plant-collections/conservation/upload/NTBG%20talk.pdf to http://www.usbg.gov/plant-collections/conservation/upload/NTBG%20talk.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:03, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Main image of the article.
editShould the main image of this article be modified to something more relevant to the material? CardboardWolf (talk) 18:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)