Talk:Massey Poyntz/GA1
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Sahara4u in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sahara4u (talk · contribs) 11:33, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Lede
edit- Any image for the lede?
- Unfortunately not at the moment. There is nothing online, and although I do have a photo of him in a book, I can't get a decent scan of it at the moment. I intend to get one eventually though! Harrias talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- “….was an English cricketer” → “was an English First-class cricketer” or simply “First-class cricketer”
- Added first-class. Harrias talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- Link right-handed batsman
- Linked batsman to Batting (cricket). Harrias talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- “.…….against Cambridge University in 1919.” “the” before Cambridge University, since you have linked it to cricket club. There may be others…..
- I disagree, that would make the sentence grammatically poor. Although it is linked to the cricket club, the way the sentence itself is phrased is perfectly acceptable. Harrias talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- Could you please rephrase the last sentence of the 2nd para?
- I can, but could you clarify what your problem with it is? Harrias talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- Last two sentences start with "After ...ing". It would be better if you avoid to repeat the same. Zia Khan 15:35, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- Tweaked it. How's that? Harrias talk 15:42, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- Looks good now. Zia Khan 16:23, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Early life and career
edit- “…followed his older brother Hugh into the Somerset side.[6]” → could you mention his full name?
- As in "Hugh Poyntz", or "Hugh Stainton Poyntz"? I don't really see the need in either case: he only had one brother named Hugh, so there is no need to include the middle name to disambiguate, and I have linked to his article anyway. It is reasonable to assume that he will have the same surname, so including that is superfluous. Harrias talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
County captain
edit- “……scoring 50 runs exactly in the second innings of a match against Middlesex at Bath.[16]” No need of “exactly” and put “the” before Bath.
- Removed "exactly", but given that Bath is a city, it would be grammatically incorrect to put "the" before it. Harrias talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- “…against Hampshire at Bath.[20]” Same as above
- As above. Harrias talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- A link to “bowling average”
- Linked. Harrias talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- “….and he scored three half-centuries.” → “and scored three half-centuries.”
- Removed "he". Harrias talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Wartime career and later life
edit- “..Poyntz was appointed to the 3rd Battalion, Bedfordshire Regiment.[29] → “third”, same for the 2nd in the next sentence
- Military units are always referred to in this format: see Category:Battalions of the British Army. Harrias talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- “averaging 10.00 from his three innings.” → no need of “his”
- Removed "his". Harrias talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Overall, the article looks good and informative. I'll take another look once the above concerns addressed. Zia Khan 11:33, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review: I have responded to your comments, and look forward to any further points you might have. Harrias talk 13:38, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Final review
edit- GA review (see Wikipedia:Good article criteria and WP:GACN)
- Well written.
- a (clear and concise prose which doesn't violate copyright laws, grammar and spelling are correct): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, and fiction:
- a (clear and concise prose which doesn't violate copyright laws, grammar and spelling are correct): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, and fiction:
- Factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (well-referenced): b (citations to reliable sources): c (Wikipedia:No original research):
- a (well-referenced): b (citations to reliable sources): c (Wikipedia:No original research):
- Broad in its coverage.
- a (covers major aspects): b (well-focused):
- a (covers major aspects): b (well-focused):
- Neutral .
- Fair representation, no bias:
- Fair representation, no bias:
- Stable.
- No edit wars nor disputed contents:
- No edit wars nor disputed contents:
- Illustrated appropriately by images.
- No image
- No image
- Conclusion: Good work with the article, passes GA criteria. Zia Khan 16:23, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: