Untitled

edit

what are some examples of a monomer?

Seriously, one cannot explain one concept in terms of more advanced concepts.

It seems that one could define a monomer only in relation to a polymer that is made out of it… otherwise, in all other respects, it's just a regular chemical compound, generally. So, the monomer is a more advanced concept than the polymer. - 92.100.170.239 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 17:35, 8 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Definition

edit

Sorry, but neither must a monomer be a small molecule nor must the monomers in oligo- or multimers be chemically bonded to each other. I would think that DNA would be a very good counter example to the definition given. Halx (talk) 11:18, 30 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

In agreement with the above; even the examples given in the article are weak as the repeating subunit (or monomer) of cellulose is the disaccharide cellobiose, not glucose. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jockey49 (talkcontribs) 11:31, 31 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Amino acids are natural monomers that polymerize at ribosomes to form proteins.
Anybody ever tried to polymerize "(natural monomer) amino acids" at ribosomes? Doesn't work. :-) GEEZERnil nisi bene 08:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Surprize? no water?

edit

“and is over 77% of the mass of all plant matter” — so, the plants have almost no water? really? Could you write into the article the statistics for plant water as well, for comparison? - 92.100.170.239 (talk) 17:30, 8 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

The cited source did not support that claim, so I removed it. I couldn't find a source for what proportion of plant matter is glucose, but Cellulose has some statistics that may be of interest. Adrian J. Hunter(talkcontribs) 11:57, 11 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Monomer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:00, 27 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Monomer/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Rated "top" as highschool/SAT biology concept. - tameeria 20:00, 28 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 20:00, 28 April 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 00:22, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Focus almost entirely on biopolymers

edit

I added a section talking about industrial polymers, since the article seemed almost entirely focused on biopolymers. Hermanoere (talk) 19:04, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

"Monomer(s)" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Monomer(s) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 25#Monomer(s) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:09, 25 March 2022 (UTC)Reply