Talk:Obligatory Villagers

Fair use rationale for Image:Obligatory villagers.jpg

Image:Obligatory villagers.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:42, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Critical Response

I wouldn't call the critical response "mixed." Allmusic gave the album 4/5, Robert Christgau gave the album an "A-" and Rolling Stone gave the album 3.5/5. Even the most negative review listed, Pitchfork's, is the equivalent of 69/100, which is still considered "positive" by MetaCritic. Does anyone agree that the critical reception section should be changed to say the album was met with generally positive reviews? -Anotheronewiki (talk) 15:56, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

I'm going to change the critical reception section to read "generally positive." If anyone disagrees with my change, please reply to my post here. -Anotheronewiki (talk) 15:24, 9 February 2017 (UTC)