| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suppression order
editI'm thinking of referring "the issue" to the Biographies of living persons Noticeboard Wikipedia:BLPN so some people outside of NZ can decide what to do on this. I asked on the Administrators' noticeboard and that is where they recommend. Thoughts? - SimonLyall (talk) 21:09, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
- There is some serious concern that the source can clearly be linked to him, and just the image isn't enough. I haven't looked into it deeply, but if the source doesn't clearly mention him in text, you will likely run afoul of WP:BLP. And I say this in a generic sense, in that with any BLP, we should avoid potentially negative information unless it is very clearly sourced, as this is a heavily enforced policy here. If all else fails or it isn't clearly linking to him in text, to go WP:BLPN and just ask to avoid problems. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 22:00, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
I have removed the suppression order sentence. As Dennis says, there has been a previous discussion on this issue at BLPN, and there has been a discussion at ANI. The cited source barely supports the assertion (just a picture of him and a caption, but the body is not about him per se). The material is jarring as it has no context to even explain why it's relevant to anything. It's just thrown in there. What's the purpose? The sentence should remain out unless there is a consensus that it is appropriate AND that it does not violate WP:BLP policy.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Watching/Editing by Strike Agency
editIt seems that an IP address of StrikeAgency.co.nz, who happen to book P Money, has been deleting information about this man. Special:Contributions/121.98.132.76. This IP address keeps referring to NZ law, which is unimportant given where Wikipedia is hosted. Wikipedia also, no doubt, breaks the laws of many countries in Asia and the Middle East, but it does not follow laws of other countries that are unethical. Tristanb (talk) 10:59, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
British P Money
editI think it's a bit too confusing with two P Moneys. Obviously, NZ's is less famous world-wide, should we consider moving this article to Peter Wadams, and having P hyphen Money redirected to P Money with a disambiguation boilerplate on P Money? Tristanb (talk) 11:14, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:P-Money/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
| Hi- This article says that P-Money was born in 1878 and died in 1972. Yet somehow his career has been active since 2001. |
Last edited at 21:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 02:06, 30 April 2016 (UTC)