This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was delete. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editSorry this was submitted twice. After submitting the first time, I saw a message saying "This article has not been submitted for review" -- in fact, this appears even now. It's not entirely clear what's happening. Fuhrmanator (talk) 21:34, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
- @Fuhrmanator: It says that is has not been submitted for review, but if the box at the bottom of the page appears, then it actually has been submitted for review. Grognard Chess (talk) Ping when replying 13:24, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Recreation
editI've recreated this article based on the very weak previous AfD, and the lack of promotional content in this version of the article. The last AfD proposer openly admits the nom was based on a cursory Google search. I believe this appears to have a semblance of notability, and different from the previously AfD'd article. Grognard Chess (talk) Ping when replying 13:24, 24 October 2014 (UTC)