Talk:Project ARMS
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Project Arms: Second Chapter???
editI have seen DVDs for sale called Project Arms: Second Chapter in 7 volumes. How does this relate to the original Project Arms (which is collected in 9 DVD volumes)??
- According to ANN, it was produced in the next season. Aired in October 2001. I would guess that it is a direct continuation. --Squilibob 00:46, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Keith Violet?
editI'd just like to know who got the information for Keith Violet's ARMS power and form.
Capabilities for the ARMS
editwhoever added "capabilities" for the Jabberwock better be dedicated enough to do the same for the rest of the ARMS, since it looks off for one to have it, while everyone else doesn't.
Acronym?
editWhat does ARMS mean? Shinobu 20:33, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- That's something that hasn't been explained in the series yet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.230.81.146 (talk) 21:29, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
What Happened? (Spoiler Alert)
editOkay, so I saw the end of the Project Arms anime. Apparently Keith Blue activates the Dormouse after Jabberwock absorbes a nuclear missile and begins to create antimatter. Then, Keith Blue destroys both Keith Black (White) and Jabberwock. What happened? Did the manga end the same way? It doesn't say what happened to the characters at the end.Metalraptor (talk) 20:22, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
No, the details and events near the end of the manga are almost completely different from anime after a certain point. The anime only seems to follow as far as Volume 18. The manga is longer and it actually explains what happened to everyone at the end. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.242.96.51 (talk) 16:25, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Merge standalone character list
editAlthough I removed the character list that was on this article[1] because there was already a standalone character list, the standalone list is mostly fancruft and once trimmed, could fit within this article. It would also improve the article and allow it to return to Start-class. —Farix (t | c) 02:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)