Talk:Psygnosis

Logo

Due credit is given for the designer of the Psygnosos logo but is it known who design the Studio Liverpool one? Designers Republic perhaps? The Seventh Taylor (talk) 11:04, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Requested move 29 September 2014

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 07:39, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

---

SCE Studio Liverpool → Psygnosis – I would like to propose that we rename the article "Psygnosis", as they were originally known. The company no longer exists in any form, and as such I believe there is no need to name the article after the company's "current" name. Wikipedia:Article titles states an article should have a commonly recognizable name, and I think "Psygnosis" is a more recognizable title than "SCE Studio Liverpool". Not only is the name more distinct, unambiguous and well-known, it also better reflects the article in terms of content as well as the company's legacy: As Psygnosis, the company developed and/or published about 200 games in a span of 17 years. As SCE Studio Liverpool, they developed only 13 games in a span of 11 years. The majority of the content in the article is about their time as Psygnosis, and a clear majority of the links to this page are linked to the redirect page "Psygnosis" anyway. Ding Chavez (talk) 16:05, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

• Support. Psygnosis returns over twice as many results in Google compared to SCE Liverpool and all of the company's most famous games from Shadow of the Beast to Lemmings to Wipeout were released under the Psygnosis banner. Previously, we had to name this article SCE Liverpool because that was the going concern, but now that the studio is closed, I agree it is proper to revert to the best known name. Indrian (talk) 17:54, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
• Support WP:UCN, most common name for the company, as it no longer exists, we use the most common one, not the current one as there isn't a current one. -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 04:43, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Discussion

If they're as distinct phases as you seem to be implying, wouldn't a split be better? - X201 (talk) 18:49, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

• No, as you may recall, we already had this discussion awhile back. They are the exact same entity under two different names, so unless a split is needed for length reasons, all the material should be kept in one article. Indrian (talk) 18:59, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

A split would be more appropriate IMO. The original Psygnosis entity was notable for games in its field BITD (I've yet to track down decent refs for this, unfortunately). And the Sony entity was notable for its continuation and development of further games. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 04:22, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Yeah, that would be great if they were two different companies, but as we all know, they are not. Don't beat the dead horse. Indrian (talk) 04:27, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

• There is a lot of edit history at the other title that will need to be retained if this move goes through. Not sure if there are also other history problems. Dekimasuよ! 06:14, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Psygnosis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120213083304/http://uk.psx.ign.com/articles/062/062933p1.html to http://uk.psx.ign.com/articles/062/062933p1.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120615013734/http://www.worldwidestudios.net/xdev to http://www.worldwidestudios.net/xdev

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:07, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Games developed or published as Psygnosis: Rastan?

There's an entry in this list labeled "Rastan", linking to the Taito arcade title of the same name. Pysgnosis didn't originate Rastan. Haven't located evidence that Psygnosis was hired/contracted to port Rastan for a home computing platform on behalf of Taito, or that Psygnosis otherwise attempted to license Rastan. Anyone have clarification/verification they are willing to share? -- Anonymous Coward 19:53, 07 February 2019 (UTC)

Shouldn't the charts under the Games section be sorted by Year as default as opposed to alphabetical order?

I have no idea how to change that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HelpMeChoose55 (talk • contribs) 02:40, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

I agree. Tables default to the order in which they are created. This table has been created alphabetically. To fix it someone would need to export the table code into something like Excel, resort it by year and then re-add it to the article. It's not a small task. - X201 (talk) 09:25, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Add pronunciation

It's /sɪɡˈnəʊ.sɪs/, as stated in the Lemmings Dig It documentary. A jobsworth reverted my addition of this correct and useful info. 2A00:23C5:FE1C:3701:4523:75FE:DE02:FB1E (talk) 15:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)