Talk:SMS Meteor (1890)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Meteor (1890)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dank (talk · contribs) 17:04, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Review

• "an aviso, of the Imperial German Navy": no comma
• " Her keel was laid in 1888, she was launched in January 1890, and completed in May 1891.": nonparallel; one fix is to replace the first comma by a semicolon
• "She served in this capacity through World War I and after the German defeat, was sold for scrapping in 1919.": A little better would be: She served in this capacity through World War I. After the German defeat, the ship was sold for scrapping in 1919.
• "p. 814": de-italicize
• Otherwise:

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   - Dank (push to talk) 18:56, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

   Can you tell I copied that first line in all of the articles of this series when I created the stubs? Everything should be fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 16:59, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Passed - Dank (push to talk) 19:48, 26 June 2013 (UTC)