Replacing highly inaccurate map of Satavahnas

edit

I'm planning to replace the highly inaccurate map of the Satavahanas, which combines different historical eras into one. This map erroneously includes territories of the Sakas within the Satavahana Kingdom, particularly Gujarat. The cited source is unreliable as it merges various time periods. As demonstrated in the Vijayanagar Empire article, I will upload a more accurate map that I found in the Gautami Putra Satakarni article. DeepstoneV (talk) 10:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Satavahanas were Abhiras

edit

Satavahanas were Abhiras[[1]] not Brahmins 2409:4085:8D31:A31E:0:0:88C9:1A12 (talk) 09:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 20 May 2024

edit

Satvahana dynesty religion is Sanatan Hindu Dharma not any Buddhism , Satvahnas reestablistshed Hinduism . Chandrashekhar Devidasrao More (talk) 17:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Do you have any reliable sources that support your statement? Myrealnamm (💬talk · ✏️contribs) at 18:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
  Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Charliehdb (talk) 10:41, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Old Tamil was neither the spoken nor the administrative one.

edit

The Tamil bilingual coins are most probably due to the trade and exchange between the neighbouring kingdoms.

Old Tamil wasn't spoken in the Satavahana territory nor they used it as the administrative language. Anandwiki.ind (talk) 17:00, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply