Talk:Shunten

King of Ryukyu Islands

According to Louis-Frédéric, Eisō was "king of the Ryūkyū Islands in the thirteenth century" ... -- see Nussbaum, Louis-Frédéric. (2002). Japan Encyclopedia, p. 172., p. 172, at Google Books

I modified the first paragraph and the succession box -- changing from "King of Okinawa" to "King of Ryukyu Islands" because of this reliable source. --Tenmei (talk) 09:35, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Shunten. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070825113418/http://rekishi.jkn21.com:80/ to http://rekishi.jkn21.com/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070825113418/http://rekishi.jkn21.com:80/ to http://rekishi.jkn21.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:38, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Shunten/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 21:52, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: AirshipJungleman29 (talk · contribs) 18:21, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

I'll take this review. Comments to follow. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:21, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

General comments

Thought I recognised the name, he's the legendary cousin of the alleged Genghis Khan! Funny old world.

• "The official histories of the Ryukyu Kingdom" might want to specify that they ruled/lived on Okinawa.
  • Fixed. - G
• "against Riyū, who had usurped" was Riyū a god too?
  • One of the sources called Shunten the first human ruler, and now I realized it was probably not something they thought about much. Clarified that lol. - G
• "He gained the recognition" should the "the" be there?
  • Fixed. - G
• "as the overlord of Okinawa chieftans in 1187" unless you're paying attention to the dates, this sounds like a different event to the revolt against Riyū.
  • Fixed. - G
• "when his grandson Gihon disappeared into the forests and was succeed by his regent Eiso" a) typo b) possibly the forest detail is unnecessary?
  • Fair point. - G
• "Invasion of Ryukyu" is the capitalised "i" needed?
  • Fixed. - G
• If he unified Okinawa, maybe say "the overlord of all Okinawa chieftains" in the first lead paragraph?
  • Good idea. - G
• "The Chūzan Seikan (lit. Reflections on Chūzan)" is this one of the histories?
  • Yes, clarified. - G
• "Japanese suiden, meaning "flooded paddy"" ... is that meant to mean something?
  • I don't get if Zenchū was making a bigger point there, no. I can remove it if need be.

Looked at Smits 2019 and Ito 2011:

• I can't find "Okinawa would not be unified until the 15th century" in Smits p.153.
  • Oops, I think I forgot a 2024 cite there. Added. - G
• Ito 2011 p. 89 fn.29 seems to indicate that Taira Shidehara's book was published in 1899.
  • Added. - G
• details about Kato Sango's 1906 critique are found around p.92.

Otherwise all good. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:46, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

• @AirshipJungleman29: Thank you very much! Fixed stuff up. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 22:20, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 15:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that the myth of Shunten, the legendary first king of Chūzan, was used to justify the 1609 Invasion of Ryukyu?

• Source: Smits, Gregory (2019). Maritime Ryukyu, 1050–1650. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press. 154–155

• ALT1: ... that the myth of Shunten, the legendary first king of Chūzan, was used to justify the 1872 annexation of Okinawa?

• Source: Itō, Yūshi (2011). "The Legend of Minamoto no Tametomo: Controversy and Connections Between Ryūkyūan/Okinawan and Japanese Histories". In Edmond, Jacob; Johnson, Henry; Leckie, Jacqueline (eds.). Recentering Asia: Histories, Encounters, Identities. Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004212619_006. ISBN 9781906876258., pp. 90–100.

• • Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Victoria Roshchyna

Improved to Good Article status by Generalissima (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 88 past nominations.

Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 00:57, 30 October 2024 (UTC).

• Hi Generalissima, this article was an interesting read! Article long enough, well-sourced, copyvio-free, and presentable. This nomination is just within the 7 day deadline. QPQ done. Hook is interesting and sourced (offline accepted in good faith).

I can't help but think a hook along the lines of: "... that the myth of Shunten, the legendary first king of Chūzan, was used to justify the 1872 annexation of Okinawa?" would be more interesting, if just because it shows how late this myth still had currency (I also suspect front page readers would be more familiar with Okinawa than Ryukyu). I'll leave it up to your judgement if you want to include such an alt. Best, Tenpop421 (talk) 18:02, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

@Tenpop421: That's actually a good point. I'll use the recommended alt hook, with Itō, Yūshi (2011). "The Legend of Minamoto no Tametomo: Controversy and Connections Between Ryūkyūan/Okinawan and Japanese Histories". In Edmond, Jacob; Johnson, Henry; Leckie, Jacqueline (eds.). Recentering Asia: Histories, Encounters, Identities. Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004212619_006. ISBN 9781906876258., pp. 90–100 as the source. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 18:09, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Nice, I've added the alt. Good to go. Tenpop421 (talk) 18:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)