Talk:Specialty drugs in the United States

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Specialty drugs in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151108032544/http://ir.valeant.com/investor-relations/news-releases/news-release-details/2014/Valeant-Pharmaceuticals-Announces-FDA-Approval-Of-Jublia-for-the-Treatment-of-Onychomycosis/default.aspx to http://ir.valeant.com/investor-relations/news-releases/news-release-details/2014/Valeant-Pharmaceuticals-Announces-FDA-Approval-Of-Jublia-for-the-Treatment-of-Onychomycosis/default.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151208051829/http://www.pppmag.com/article_print.php?articleid=1637 to http://www.pppmag.com/article_print.php?articleid=1637
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151007174643/http://jhoponline.com/innovations-in-oncology-management/part-6/16444-specialty-pharmacy-services-an-overview-for-oncology-practices to http://jhoponline.com/innovations-in-oncology-management/part-6/16444-specialty-pharmacy-services-an-overview-for-oncology-practices
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140226224657/http://doctorsoftheworld.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Gileads-HCV-drug-sofosbuvir-approved-but-accessible-for-how-many-09DEC2013.pdf to http://doctorsoftheworld.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Gileads-HCV-drug-sofosbuvir-approved-but-accessible-for-how-many-09DEC2013.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:45, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

REMS and Breakthrough therapy as part of Specialty Drug definition

I believe the REMS status, and the Breakthrough Therapy designation should also be listed in the Definition and common characteristics section of this "Specialty drugs" article. This stood out to me when I noticed the item "3 AARP" seems to be out of order. It should probably be part of section 3.3.

So back to my first point would change section 1 to the following:

1 Definition and common characteristics

   1.1 High cost
   1.2 High complexity
   1.3 High touch
   1.4 Limited availability
   1.5 Rare and complex diseases
   1.6 REMS status
   1.7 Breakthrough therapy

and the details under 1.6 and 1.7 headings as follows

1.6 REMS status

   A drug requiring a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy to minimize the risk to patients.

1.7 Breakthrough therapy

   A drug that has had very promising phase2 rather than phase3 clinical trial results, allowing early introduction of a much needed therapy to the market.

Note: Sections 3.1 and 3.2 should remain as currently exist in the article.

Note2: I am not citing sources since there is no existing formal standard definition for "Specialty Drugs". First I am attempting to promote a discussion on the need to more closely define the criterion for specialty drugs by including REMS and Breakthrough Therapy in that section, and Second to clean up the article in that I believe the AARP section is miss-placed.

RStem (talk) 16:37, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Title and creating a specialty drugs page not limited to US

I understand the (current) redirect from specialty drugs to this page, since the article is fairly focused on the US situation. However, there really should be a page for specialty drugs in general, since these drugs are being produced and used around the world.--Wuerzele (talk) 23:12, 15 May 2022 (UTC)