This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
To editor RandomCanadian: before you prodded this article, there was a move request (shown here) that resulted in merging the since deleted article (shown here). My purpose of getting the deleting admin to userfy these two pages was so I could merge in the extra information after checking it for copyright violations. Then I saw your prod, so I don't want to go to the trouble if this article is to be deleted. Do you think with the additional info from the deleted article that it passes GNG and is savable? P.I. Ellsworthed.put'r there16:05, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Paine Ellsworth: As regards GNG, all the information is again from the same two sources as here (along with a WP:CIRCULAR reference to this). This needs "significant coverage from multiple reliable independent sources" - receiving FDA approval for a trial, or receiving a grant, or publishing papers in peer reviewed journals is WP:RUNOFTHEMILL for someone in this discipline, so we need something more substantial. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 17:49, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
As I say, the solution is to do some bit of research and try to see if you can find adequate sources which amount to WP:GNG. If you do, then you are free to improve the article with those and remove the prod. Otherwise the outcome is what you'd expect. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 19:34, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}