Talk:Sylacauga (meteorite)

Latest comment: 1 month ago by ResistivKai in topic Re: Requested Photograph

Fork

edit

I forked the article:

  1. in Hodges meteorite I left everything about the fragment that hits Mrs Hodges and the consequences of this event
  2. in Sylacauga (meteorite) I put everything about the meteorite fall from a scientifical viewpoint

In my opinion this is the best solution. Basilicofresco (talk) 10:35, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not the only one

edit

There is a second known instance of a meteor striking a human. A Ugandan boy was hit with a 3 gram piece of a meteor in the Mbale strike. I've found a number of links to it, some of them on college astronomy sites.

Here's one: http://astro.wsu.edu/worthey/astro/html/im-meteor/strikes.html

I'm going to delete / modify the comment in the article about the only one, hearing no objections here. Dictouray (talk) 17:54, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Done, I just updated the article. Thanks for pointing it out! -- Basilicofresco (msg) 11:39, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
The first one in the astro.wsy.edu page states: "On September 27, 2003, a bright meteor fragmented into several pieces, which injured at least three people in the Orissa region of eastern India." so article is still incorrect. Kahkonen (talk) 08:42, 12 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Well done. --Basilicofresco (msg) 09:20, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hoax

edit

I have removed the unproven claim (and obvious hoax) of a person allegedly hit by a meteorite earlier this month.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Geogene (talkcontribs) 00:22, 26 June 2009‎

Self-dealing?

edit

McKinney sold the meteorite to a lawyer from Indianapolis who later purchased it for the Smithsonian Institution.

When he purchased it for the Smithsonian Institution, who did the lawyer buy it from, himself? This sentence is simply incoherent. Felsenst (talk) 21:41, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Done - It looks like this has already been fixed. The lawyer bought it from Julius Kempis McKinney and donated it to the Smithsonian. --Marc Kupper|talk 02:31, 11 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sylacauga (meteorite). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:59, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Re: Requested Photograph

edit
 
The Hodges/Sylacauga meteorite at the Alabama Museum of Natural History on October 21st, 2024.

Howdy, all!

Per the photo request on this article, I've uploaded an image of the meteorite at the Alabama Museum of Natural History on the Wikimedia Commons, which can be found here through the linked thumbnail. I've never made a Wikipedia edit before, so I figured I would leave the decision to crop the image to those who might know better. If a better quality photo is needed, please let me know so I can go back and take another sometime soon!

All the best,
ResistivKai (talk) 23:17, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

I decided to go ahead, be bold, and include a cropped version in the main infobox of the article, while moving the old image into the body of the article.
If I made any mistake or if the latter image can be better positioned, please help me out and let me know what I can do better next time!
All the best,
ResistivKai (talk) 04:12, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply