This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Source
editHello, I'm the creator of this page. Yes, I did use the website in question for research but much of this article is the back cover summary, which I believe we are permitted to carry. I will alter the critical reaction section.--Wyvern Rex. (talk) 14:52, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- The back cover summary is too extensive to copy in light of the overall length of the article, the lack of other content, and the ability for someone else to write a summary in their own words. It just wont qualify for fair use, so I have removed it. Monty845 16:06, 6 July 2012 (UTC)