This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
@Elcobbola: I didn't see a link for the deletion discussion of the photo, could you please link to that? The photo seems to originate from here where it says "Click on the thumbnail to view the full size photo. Photos on the Senate PhotoWire are intended for media and public use and may be freely reproduced." That the photo is being used on other sites on the web seems in line with the granted permission and does not seem to be a reason to delete it from commons. BBQboffin (talk) 03:46, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello @BBQboffin: I'm not the person you pinged, but I wanted to let you know about a resource on Wikipedia. There is this page, Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, which deals directly with inquiries like this and would be visible to many more people who could respond to you. I recommend taking this issue there, in addition to this thread here. RoundSquare (talk) 03:56, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
There was no reference to that site--the uploader falsely claimed self authorship and a bogus cc license. However, even if that site had been referenced, the cited statement would not be adequate as it violates the licensing policy in numerous ways; for example: a) we require a specific license (that statement is not a license); b) we require use for all purposes (that statement is limited to "media and public use"); c) we require explicit allowance of derivatives (that statement is silent); and d) we require licenses to be explicitly perpetual and irrevocable (that statement is silent). Verily, this is why it is a copyright violation--a violation of policy(ies) related to copyright--and was speedy deleted as such. Such files are deleted on sight and no discussion is necessary. If the image's author wishes to freely license the image, they may send permission using the process at c:COM:VRT. Note that copyright initially vests with the author (photographer), not the mere subject (Tom Barrett), so purports from the subject or entities controlled by the subject (senatortombarrett.com) will need to offer evidence of a transfer of copyright. Эlcobbolatalk12:59, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The Congresman elect requested to be given one of the offices his great grandfather had occupied. He was not in the lottery as it was agreed to let him have the room. 108.53.141.251 (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you; I corrected this per the NYT source which says he circulated a letter requesting his fellow lawmakers to consider leaving the office space vacant. He did have a lottery number, though. BBQboffingrill me18:11, 22 November 2024 (UTC)Reply
.png){kind=link}