| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Un-Thinkable (I'm Ready) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
The article says a remix may make a re-release; the remix features a verse from Drake. It's official [1]. It came out on May 19th [2]. I added it on the page and someone deleted it, it really should stay because its fact. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nyj1218 (talk • contribs) 03:45, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
![[1]](http://content.onsmash.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/a-keys_unthinkableimreadyrmx-ft.drake_.jpg){kind=link}
Title
editWhy is there a capital "t" in the title? Yves (talk) 17:07, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
- Never mind. Yves (talk) 22:18, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- I did wonder if it was "grammatically" correct or not. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 22:19, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I wondered that because the part after the hyphen is still part of the same word, but according to MOS:CAPS#Composition titles, they are to be capitalized in compositions, which is why, I guess, you can have Doo-wop, but Doo-Wops & Hooligans. Yves (talk) 22:29, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hmmm I guess its because songs are also counted as published works thus its legal title is "Un-Thinkable (I'm Ready)". -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 22:57, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, or something like that. Yves (talk) 04:07, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
- Hmmm I guess its because songs are also counted as published works thus its legal title is "Un-Thinkable (I'm Ready)". -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 22:57, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I wondered that because the part after the hyphen is still part of the same word, but according to MOS:CAPS#Composition titles, they are to be capitalized in compositions, which is why, I guess, you can have Doo-wop, but Doo-Wops & Hooligans. Yves (talk) 22:29, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
- I did wonder if it was "grammatically" correct or not. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 22:19, 26 December 2010 (UTC)