Talk:Vahagn Khachaturyan
Latest comment: 1 month ago by 86.31.178.164 in topic An unclear sentence
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vahagn Khachaturyan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
GK
editWrite name of prime minister with their country 2402:8100:2104:91CA:0:0:252A:3BBD (talk) 10:44, 26 May 2022 (UTC)
Undue weight?
editI guess undue weight is given to the incident at Westminster Hall. --Andres (talk) 20:37, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- I second this. Most of the text relating to his presidency is about him taking a picture and chatting at a funeral. That’s ridiculous. 86.31.178.164 (talk) 01:09, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
An unclear sentence
editReports indicated that Khachaturyan was not only photographed but also accused of loudly chatting with his entourage during the solemn event.
- Did the same people who photographed him accuse him of loudly chatting? --Andres (talk) 20:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- This is not confusing at all. It says “with” his entourage, not “by” his entourage. How good is your English, Andres? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.31.178.164 (talk) 01:12, 29 September 2024 (UTC)