Talk:Vehicle Production Group

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2601:580:C000:76B0:A631:E7E0:1249:95C5 in topic Hola

Confusing

edit

It says produced 2011-present in the right hand side. And then the article implies production ceased in 2013. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.178.27.147 (talk) 23:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

The following two sentences seem rather contradictory: "Because it is handicap accessible, the MV-1 will continue to be approved for taxi use even after the new Nissan NV200 has replaced all other yellow cabs. The MV-1 is the first purpose-built taxicab to be allowed to enter service as a yellow cab since the iconic Checker Marathon." Shouldn't the Nissan be a yellow cab, too? It is replacing the old CMs but not allowed to enter public service? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 18:05, 12 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

The MV-1 was approved for use first: the NV200 won't even enter service until late 2013, and no contract has even been signed yet as handicapped folks are currently suing the city. So no, not contradictory.  ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk) 00:42, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
However, it seems that the statement that it will continue to be accepted as a replacement after the NV200's introduction may actually be untrue: [1].

So in response over recent years, the Taxi and Limousine Commission had been approving alternatives to the Crown Victoria, such as Fusion and Escape (including hybrid versions); Toyota Camry and Prius; and such diesels as in Mercedes-Benz M-Class and E-Class; Volkswagen Jetta, Golf, and Touareg; and Audi Q7. Others on the approved list were Toyota Highlander and a wheelchair-accessible Sienna, Nissan Altima, Lincoln MKZ, Hyundai Sonata, and the MV-1, a wheelchair-accessible model designed by Vehicle Production Group and assembled by AM General. However, once the NV200 taxi becomes available, the approved list drops to just that one.

I originally introduced the statement because I read it somewhere (VPG's own site, maybe) but I lost the quote before I could reference it. It still might become true, but here's another reference stating that the MV-1 (and all other non-NV200s) will be obsolete by 2018. That ought to be fixed.  ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃  (talk) 00:58, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Vehicle Production Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:23, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Still in production

edit

The intro says "The Vehicle Production Group was an automobile manufacturer" but the infobox says "Production 2011-Present". Which is it? --Cornellier (talk) 02:28, 21 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hola

edit

Nesecito saber como busco las pastillas de frenos para este vehículo no lo encuentran en el sistema por su bil number 2601:580:C000:76B0:A631:E7E0:1249:95C5 (talk) 17:59, 29 September 2023 (UTC)Reply