 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Images
editHello, recently while looking for images of this new dinosaur among the media pages, I found a very good images of fossil replicas in the museum, and it turns out that in the bottom says that they are available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. [1] Would it be nice to add a few pictures? User:FunkMonk Levi bernardo (talk) 23:50, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
- The images look nice, though I am unsure about accuracy given the mount is heavily restored. In particular, I don't really see the rugose projection on the parietal ridge. Lythronaxargestes (talk) 02:12, 12 February 2017 (UTC)
- True, I said the same thing when I saw the images of the mold. But I can contact the sculptor and the author of the publication about why you do not see the rugose projection on the parietal ridge, and other details. It is a rare thing since in the publication it is one of the bones that more deals in the text. Levi bernardo (talk) 19:40, 12 February 2017 (UTC)