90.142.52.139
Latest comment: 20 days ago by 90.142.52.139 in topic Stop before you're blocked
Report
editThis person User:Magentic Manifestations always editing to increase Hindutva dominance in India. This person also editing to increase hate on Muslims in India Example L. K. Advani. He is also sugarcoating all the pages in Wikipedia which have criticism against Hindutva and BJP.He is using cloudy editing summary. I humbly request you to monitor this person and report him for hate editing and sugarcoating. Cranequartz (talk) 08:29, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Stop before you're blocked
editThree different people have now reverted your strange hard-to-understand addition to Aladdin (disambiguation), and you have no support for it. Stop trying to edit war it in before you're blocked. Bishonen | tålk 22:04, 31 October 2024 (UTC).
- "Addition"? Have you too got it the wrong way around? I am the one who has deleted a hard-to-understand (at least to me) and consistently unexplained addition by others of one single person who is already mentioned in the linked DAB.90.142.52.139 (talk) 22:12, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm talking about the redundant phrase "and people with it", which you have added every time. How could something possibly be a male given name and not refer to "people with it"? Bishonen | tålk 22:14, 31 October 2024 (UTC).
- OK, I overlooked that phrase. It came with the revert of all people who thought it was okay to single out one person by mentioning him twice - in this article and the linked one. Which I am puzzled nobody had a problem with. 90.142.52.139 (talk) 22:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Then the most recent version by Martin Evans is hopefully now OK for you. Bishonen | tålk 22:22, 31 October 2024 (UTC).
- Yes, it is.90.142.52.139 (talk) 22:25, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Esprit d'escalier: while I agree that the phrase is unnecessary in this context, I don't agree that it's hard to understand if you think about it. There is a huge difference between a list of persons with a particular name and an article about the name itself, its (possible) origin, emergence in history, (possible) meaning(s), geographical and social wanderings, variant forms, etcetera. 90.142.52.139 (talk) 16:05, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it is.90.142.52.139 (talk) 22:25, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- Then the most recent version by Martin Evans is hopefully now OK for you. Bishonen | tålk 22:22, 31 October 2024 (UTC).
- OK, I overlooked that phrase. It came with the revert of all people who thought it was okay to single out one person by mentioning him twice - in this article and the linked one. Which I am puzzled nobody had a problem with. 90.142.52.139 (talk) 22:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- I'm talking about the redundant phrase "and people with it", which you have added every time. How could something possibly be a male given name and not refer to "people with it"? Bishonen | tålk 22:14, 31 October 2024 (UTC).
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |