A plague of rainbows

Welcome!

Hello, A plague of rainbows, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 19:51, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Amish. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Zsero (talk) 21:25, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 13:58, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

TextForge

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article TextForge, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of TextForge. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 20:02, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to The Legend of Zelda (series). Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Neverquick (talk) 19:35, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Bradeos Graphon Βραδέως Γράφων (talk) 20:21, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:41, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikilinks

There are actual rules for making wikilinks, unlike the way you added a wikilink in G. K. Butterfield. Many words have more than one meaning, and thus mindlessly and haphazardly wikilinking a word without taking two seconds to check it first might take you to an article that has nothing to do with the article that contains the link. That's what happened when you made the link [[Lenai]] in reference to Lenai Butterfield. It doesn't go to any article about Lenai Butterfield; in fact, there is no article about her. Instead it takes you to redirect, which has absolutely nothing to do with Lenai Butterfield. Wikipedia can't read your mind and figure out what you're trying to do. And if there is no article to which you wikilink, it doesn't just magically appear after you add the brackets. Please stop adding wikilinks until you have read Help:Link. You're just creating a mess that the rest of us have to clean up. Ward3001 (talk) 20:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

where do you think, the name came from?

First of all, you have no idea how the Butterfield family decided to give her that name or whether it had anything to do with the subject of your link; if you think you know, you need to provide a source; otherwise it's original research. And secondly, if we linked every word to its origin, Wikipedia would be a huge mass of confusion. If someone clicks a wikilink, he is expecting to find out more information about the person, object, or concept that is linked. If I'm reading the article on George W. Bush and see that his daughter Jenna is wikilinked and click it, I want to read about Jenna Bush, not about the origin or the name Jenna or all the other meanings that word has. If someone clicks Lenai in the Butterfield article, he finds out nothing about Lenai Butterfield. The article is not about word or name origins. It's about Butterfield. Let's please use a little common sense. Please, please read Help:Link and WP:LINK before creating any more wikilinks so the rest of us don't have to clean up after you. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 01:49, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

as you like to clean, feel free. you're welcome.

I don't like to clean, but I care enough about Wikipedia to not leave junk in it deposited by someone else. And after an editor adds enough junk and gets enough requests to stop, I generally get them blocked. Ward3001 (talk) 18:18, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The Way Out Record for Children

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Way Out Record for Children, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Way Out Record for Children. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 20:23, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Palisades Center

Hi. Please do not add unsourced personal observations to articles, as you did to Palisades Center. Doing this is a violation of Wikipedia's core policies. Please look through those policies for help in editing more constructively to this site. If you need any help with this, let me know. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 01:39, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

War-torn

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages such as War-torn. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. NawlinWiki (talk) 14:34, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Blocked for 3 hours

Your recent edits to grappling hold (diff) and nuclear export signal (diff) have been blatant vandalism. As a result, you have been temporarily blocked from editing. When the block expires, you are welcome to continue to make constructive contributions; further vandalism will result in longer blocks being applied. -- The Anome (talk) 18:24, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Deliberately adding incorrect information

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you deliberately introduce incorrect information, as you did here, you will be blocked from editing. Ward3001 (talk) 00:36, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Self-redirects

Please don't create self-redirects, as you did here. It's pointless to create a wikilink that goes back to the same article that contains the link, it's frustrating to the reader, and it's a waste of Wikipedia resources. Ward3001 (talk) 20:54, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Boy Howdy

An article that you have been involved in editing, Boy Howdy, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Boy Howdy. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ward3001 (talk) 00:38, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Christina Carter

A tag has been placed on Christina Carter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ecoleetage (talk) 04:07, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Jpbbad.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Jpbbad.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —  scetoaux (T|C) 04:42, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Jimi Hendrix

Please don't put in a lot of unsourced material as you did to the Jimi Hendrix article. Find the sources first, before inserting the information. Thanks. --HJensen, talk 21:44, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jimmy Page, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 20:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Skinny ties

A tag has been placed on Skinny ties requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Mayalld (talk) 13:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Webintosh

A tag has been placed on Webintosh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Ironholds 18:40, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Hoodia. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:01, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Honorific titles in popular music

Your pointy additions to Honorific titles in popular music have been removed more than once. Please stop. --Elliskev 13:11, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Your pointy additions to Honorific titles in popular music have been removed more than once. Please stop. One more example of this and I will post all your threads on that article to an admin. — Realist² (Speak) 19:12, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

• Don't worry, I'm already aware of it, and you can take this as your- second- final warning. Your next such edit will be your last on this encyclopedia. --Rodhullandemu 19:15, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:IncredibleStringBand.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IncredibleStringBand.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 00:01, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Jimi Hendrix, again

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Jimi Hendrix. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, your edits will be considered vandalism and you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ward3001 (talk) 20:09, 22 August 2008 (UTC)

Jimi Hendrix, warning

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Jimi Hendrix, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ward3001 (talk) 02:57, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Skyclad Records. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. --Eastmain (talk) 16:50, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Skyclad Records

An article that you have been involved in editing, Skyclad Records, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skyclad Records. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Eastmain (talk) 16:50, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Tremolo arm Jimi Hendrix

You're overlooking something. There was no "unique placement of the tremolo arm" on Hendrix' guitars. He simply played his guitars left-handed and upside down. Note how the knobs are above the strings as well and how the word "Fender" on the headstock is upside down too [1].    SIS  13:21, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Good point Strikeout_Sister. So "A plague of rainbows" please stop putting in these unreferenced accounts. It is OR, when you don't have a citation.--HJensen, talk 15:50, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

yes, you're correct. so the arm was ABOVE the strings in line with his wrist, not below the string only manipulatable by his fingertips as it would normally be.— Preceding unsigned comment added by plague of rainbows (talk • contribs) 17:00, September 18, 2008

You're missing my point. The placement wasn't unique at all. The arm is exactly were you expect it to be when you turn a guitar upside down. The habit of playing a guitar upside down is pretty rare, though. But that's another story which is already well mentioned in the article.    SIS  20:10, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

the placement was unique relative to him self, and was key to his use of it. this is the salient fact.

You can't make this statement, because merely observing a video and analyzing it is original research. You need verifiable third party coverage in reliable sources. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 17:26, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

And since you have a history of adding unsourced information to the same article (and others), please be advised:
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Jimi Hendrix, you will be blocked from editing. Ward3001 (talk) 17:39, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

edit count | edit summary usage

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for a period of time. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page, replacing your reason here with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia after the block has expired, you will be blocked for longer and longer periods of time.  Kukini ^{háblame aquí} 13:28, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ssi-Ruuk. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --EEMIV (talk) 19:50, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Good references

Please refrain from removing good references from articles that you edit. Thanks, if you need help let me know. --Banime (talk) 15:09, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

Be careful of NPA

I'm not exactly sure what this edit summary was saying exactly, but it sounded to me like a possible personal attack. How did you know the user in question was a republican, and how does that automatically make him racist? Those types of things can be construed as personal attacks and have no place on wikipedia. Please read WP:NPA before continuing editing and making edit summaries. Thanks, if you need help ask. --Banime (talk) 15:13, 18 October 2008 (UTC)

these WP:* rules are against the spirit of the wiki concept and are orthogonal to my activities on this site.

Incorrect. They are part of the idea of effective collaboration here in a collegiate atmosphere. If that is not to your taste, we can always ensure that you are able to edit, but not here. You've had many chances here and it's probably not a great idea to throw them away. --Rodhullandemu 17:55, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

I agree, if you want to just edit then do so without attacking other editors. There's nothing limiting about that.--Banime (talk) 11:57, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Honorific titles in popular music

Your tag needs some justification; it's insufficient just to tag it. In any event, it's an issue of wording already addressed by the {{peacock}} tag, and is being addressed as time permits. Thanks. --Rodhullandemu 17:09, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Porpoise, you will be blocked from editing. --Tombstone (talk) 04:16, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

I'd have to say that this edit of yours on Talk:The_Age_of_Intelligent_Machines is disruptive. It really adds nothing to the article and simply makes fun of whoever wrote it, or the subject itself. Please stop making unrelated attacks on articles/people while editing. If you need help ask. I have removed the comment from the talk page. --Banime (talk) 15:44, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

Also, please stop making completely useless and possibly disruptive edits as you did on the article Jacques_Roubaud (See this). Yes, everyone ages, you do not need to put that into the article. If you have questions or need help ask me on my talk page. --Banime (talk) 15:57, 23 October 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Home Computer, you will be blocked from editing. --Banime (talk) 15:56, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Please, do not add false information to wikipedia articles as you did here. Yes, it shows a photo of him manning a chipwich cart in 1984, it does not state that he supported himself by running a chipwich cart in 1981-1982. You've been warned multiple times, these things should not happen as it is disruptive. --Banime (talk) 22:30, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruption. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Blueboy96 22:45, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

Looking at your contributions, you're very lucky you haven't been indefblocked. However, if you continue along your current route, an indef will definitely be coming your way. Blueboy96 22:46, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusive sockpuppetry. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —Wknight94 (talk) 01:58, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Cold Y Generation

An editor has nominated Cold Y Generation, an article which you have created or worked on, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cold Y Generation and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. --Law Lord (talk) 01:57, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Aewm

I have nominated Aewm, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aewm. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Psychonaut (talk) 15:37, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Dwm

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Dwm. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwm. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Dwm

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Dwm. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dwm (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ComputerEyes

The article ComputerEyes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references and not notable / not worth being on wikipedia

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chocolate4921 17:39, 10 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chocolate4921 (talk • contribs)

File:Gmpc ss.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gmpc ss.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:11, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of LightningPaint

The article LightningPaint has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unaddressed notability issue (since 2008).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Darthbunk Pakt Dunft (message) 17:13, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Wmii-logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wmii-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:50, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Black Sun Ensemble

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Black Sun Ensemble requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – S. Rich (talk) 00:25, 16 October 2021 (UTC)