User talk:After Midnight/Archive 4

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

→

Archive 10

Orphaned fair use image (Image:USA_Mens_National_Team.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:USA_Mens_National_Team.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 06:57, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

This image has been added back into the article from which it was removed and is no longer an orphan. For more detail, please see Talk:United States men's national soccer team#Restoring Image:USA Mens National Team.jpg --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 11:26, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

I just thought that I would respond here as well, and note that you clearly made an honest mistake in the incredibly byzantine world of Wikipedia:Fair use; further, your responsible identification of the copyright holder allowed us to spot something we shouldn't be using. Please don't worry about it. Jkelly 04:07, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the kind words. I'm glad that you recognized my intent. I'm also glad that I learned something, so the next time I try to upload an image, I will know more about what to watch out for. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 04:22, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

good faith vandal

I looked through the edits of User:68.117.46.48 and particulary, this one I viewed as trying to make a valid addition to the article. While it may or may not have been, i sensed good faith here. Assuming that as good faith, your reversion here (also in good faith) appears as vandalism to the first edit because he felt he was making a valid addition. Possible offended or feeling that he valid contribution was removed he viewed you as a vandal (which you of course are not). Hope this helped! If you have any more questions, please let me know. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 20:50, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Sorry I have taken so long to respond! I make mistakes, he may have been a vandal. If there is continuing issues, i have no problem if you repost to WP:AIV! Hope this helps, sorry i may not have made the best decision, especially in your interest. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 01:02, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I took a recent revision of my initial decision. It may not have been good faith, however this shows that they did not repeat the act of vandalism after a final warning. It is customary to not block if vandalism is not repeated after a bv or a t4. I have not been involved in this situation since. Thanks for your concern and the time you spend defending vandalim. It is much appreciated-- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 01:09, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		I, Chrislk02, award you this defender of the wiki barnstar for your well chosen reverts and excellent job defending wikipedia! It is much appreciated. -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 01:09, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Peter Delgrosso

The article Peter Delgrosso is up for AfD discusssion. Looking through the edit history of that article it appears you may be aware of a previous deletion and subsequent recreation of this article. Thought you may want an opportunity to join in on the dicussion there. Thanks! Steevo714 00:13, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Hometowns

Hi! I noticed you pointed out a redlink for a 1986 hometown... feel like doing me a favour? I discovered a new source of hometowns... the opening number videos of the pageants from Youtube! The ones from the eighties in particular have all the hometowns... but the problem is translating what they are saying into an actual placename! The majority are fine but for some they are just undecipherable... Anyway here is the link for 1986... the ones I couldn't get were Maryland, Georgia, New York, Pennsylvania (and clearly Tennesse!). If you're patient and you've got a few minutes, care to try and help me work them out? -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 03:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

OK, I got these: MN, NY, ND, PA, SD, TN, VT, and WY, but these: GA, MD and WA, are still missing. Whew, that was harder than I expected. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 04:23, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

It's trickier than it seems, isn't it! I used a combination of Wikipedia's "Lists of cities" (etc) and google... Google was good for phonetic variations (i.e. I typed in "carny" and it turned out the place was Kearny!). Thanks for fixing those other ones up... good work! -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 04:25, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

PS tricky though it is, it's quite fun too, no? Beautiful girls and great costumes! (yes I am female, but its still fun - that's what pageants are all about!) -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 04:27, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

PPS I am from New Zealand so translating the various regional accents is also a challenge! -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 04:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

LOL; but now I'm tired and need to go to bed. Yes, between the accents and actually knowing some of the cities (like PA) made some of them easier for me. I didn't know about the phonetic thing on Google, maybe I'll go back and try that on the 3 I missed. Tomorrow I expect to start on the tables for the Teen USAs. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 04:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Formatting

Hmmm. Recently I’ve been piping the wikilinks to the Miss USA year articles to save space in the table (eg) [[Miss USA 2006|Top 10]] instead of Top 10 at [[Miss USA 2006]]. I was going to continue doing that as I went through the hometown lists, but I just realised you’ve gone to the effort to go through the rest and add the long versions…

What do you think we should do? Which version do you prefer? -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 22:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

I just did Miss America 2007, Miss Teen for 2005 & 2006, and Miss USA for 2000 & 2001. First off, let me say I still have over halfway to go, so I have no problem reversing course. So don't factor in what I already did, I have no problem going back and making the change.

• I think that for Miss America it should stay in, because people get confused (I think) about how the state pageant is dated a year earlier than the national pageant.
• As far as the Miss USA and Teen USA go, I was just being consistent, but you are right, it does save space to pipe it. The piping standard says to not make "unexpected pipes", but I think that this is OK. If you would prefer pipes, I can be equally happy with that.
• Another option that you could consider (except for Miss America) is that we could change it back to a regular text link and then pipe the year link in the left column. This way, every state pageant would have links to all of the national pageants (only for blue ones - I would leave the red alone), even if that state didn't place.
• One other thing that I struggle with is Finalist vs. Semi-finalist vs. Top Ten vs. Top 10. Naturally, over the years, the quantities have changes, so I think that we should consider using Top 10 or Top 15 where appropriate instead of finalist/semi-finalist. Do you agree?

I'll put my editing of these on hold while you think about all this, just let me know (and then I'll bang it all out in my usual machine like fashion... lol). --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 22:39, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Honestly, I would love to know how you can work so quickly! As for your suggestion... I love the idea to wiki the year rather than the placement... sounds great! I will go back and correct any I have changed if you haven't already. Good idea to leave Miss America... even I find it confusing. As for top 10 v top 15 v semi-finalist etc... don't worry about that, leave it as-is and I will fix them later using the Pageant Almanac. In the long run I will have "Top 12"/"Top 10"/whatever as it is more precise and informative. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 22:52, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Benko

U r correct, of course. I didn't know how to start a new page. It was my short way to do it. Meant to delete it ... tx. --Epeefleche 01:33, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Ah, OK. I see what you did. FYI, there are a number of easier ways to do that.... such as:

• Do exactly what you did, but preview instead of saving. In the preview you will still get the red link that you can click on and create the article.
• Do a similar thing, but do it in the WP:Sandbox
• Type the article name in the search box on the left...
• Actually, I should probably just suggest that you look at this: Help:Starting a new page

Please feel free to drop in and ask any questions if you think I can help with anything. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 02:08, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Wins By State

I don't know whay my table (Wins By State) was moved, it is a valid piece of information for anyone looking for information on the Miss America Pageant, it really shouldnt matter who they represented because the Miss Columbus, Ohio pageant is now probably part of the Miss Ohio pageant organization. I worked very hard on this table and I would apprieciate it not being moved from where I posted it. Please leave response on my talk page, BlueEyes8724 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueeyes8724 (talk • contribs) 18:44, 11 February 2007

Please check out my revisions, please let me know if they are up to your standards. Please respond on my talk page. BlueEyes8724 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueeyes8724 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 13 February 2007

Miss Teen America

Heh - what a non-notable mess! Have prodded it and will take it to afd later if need be. Yes I have been "busy" - what a waste of time though. PS my latest project is completing the Miss America and Miss Teen USA year articles back to 2000 (see the latest, sans contestants table, which is Miss Teen USA 2004). -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 21:17, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

I have also prodded Miss International (USA) and Miss Teen International (USA). -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 21:26, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Meh

Thanks for cleaning up after me :P I really am editing in a bit of a daze and should be more careful :P Thanks also for commenting here -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 03:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

LOL. You've cleaned up enough of my edits for me to return the favor. I figure that we've got to work together to keep up the quality. As far as the other matter goes, don't let things get you down and keep holding yourself to your usual standards. If you need to talk, I'm usually here at least once a day; and if you need to get away, just take a break and get refreshed. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 03:20, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

revision $1 dated $2 by $3"

// User:Lupin/popups.js
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="' 
            + 'http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Lupin/popups.js&oldid=88729935'  
            + '&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript&dontcountme=s"></script>');

Made the change to your User:After_Midnight/monobook.js, by adding &oldid=88729935 [1]. should work like before.--Hu12 07:49, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Edit to Venice Kong

According to Wikipedia:Manual of Style, the boldface present in the Playboy Special Editions section was wrong. The templates in the infobox now shows also the measure in SI units. If you find other Playmate articles with these errors, and have time, please correct them. Bye and good work. --Attilios 00:42, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Ah, OK! Sometimes I made so many similar edits that I get confused. Bye and good work. --Attilios 00:52, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Pageant tag for Judith Grace?

She won Miss Mexico in 1981. Morenooso 04:26, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

I'm working my way in that direction. I've worked my way from 2007 back to 2001, so I won't get to 1981 for a little bit yet, but don't worry, I'll get there. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 04:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Hi

Can you do cleanup of all the articles on my user page? I have been editing them lots and need it. Thanks.--Empire Earth 20:01, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Well, there wasn't much there that needed cleanup, but I did all the basic WP:AWB and WP:RETF, which I think is what you were asking. One thing I didn't change because I wasn't sure about it in the context of the article is the capitalization of "age/s" (ex. Stone Age, etc.) in Empire Earth --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 20:23, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Championship

Hi there! Sorry for the late answer but I was away for a few days. What I would suggest is picking two or three of these categories and nominating those as an "umbrella" and see what people think of it. At a first glance these do appear to be overcategorization, but getting more opinions doesn't hurt. If people concur on deleting those two or three, doing an umbrella for the rest of them would be appropriate. HTH! >Radiant< 10:10, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for re-considering my RfA. I am pleased and impressed that you have been following the progress - I get the impression that some people cast their vote and move on to the next nomination. I'm glad that I had the chance to address your concerns. Thanks again, Andrwsc 18:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

You are welcome, and congratulations on your promotion. I know who I'll be coming to when I need template help from now on... :-) --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 22:02, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

An idea

I just had an idea for your amazing skills... I was thinking about wiklinking all references to "Miss Photogenic" and "Miss Congeniality" in the Miss USA & Teen USA state articles formatted like [[Miss USA Special Awards#Miss Photogenic|Miss Photogenic]]. What do you think? -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 03:29, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

I wrote you a long... long message last night but the internet connection went down and I lost it! Thanks for agreeing to do this, probably best if you just link the first instance of each time, like the locations. -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 19:54, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

I'll respond to the rest of your message later. In the mean-time, I'm going to link once in the table and if it is in the header, I will link it there also. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 23:04, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! That was fast :) -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 05:23, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Aargh, maybe you spoke too soon. I just spent several hours filling in all the blanks. Many of the states weren't tagged yet, so I had to go back through everything and add them by hand. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 22:19, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Another thought I had was perhaps creating a category for some of the states with many related wiki articles... Texas and Virginia for example, with the new cat being Category:Miss Virginia USA & Teen USA or something similar. I actually successfully nominated for deletion Category:Miss Virginia USA and Teen USA separately a few months back because the cats were small and I didn't expect them to grow, but I was thinking more recently that a combined cat might be a useful way of joining the bio and state articles together. What do you think? Another option is simply "Virginia pageantry" and the like and also linking in any associated Miss Virginia (America)articles.

One other thing I'm doing is continuing to create articles like Miss USA 1999, but I'd hold off wikilinking them in until I've got a few more done, perhaps to 1995? Anyway do you prefer the table style (see Miss Teen USA 2005) or the list style (Miss USA 1999)? The table style is good in that it presents more information but I like the cleaner list version. Let me know what you think.

You might have noticed my little referencing habit... I just discovered we have access to the "Factiva" database through uni and I have been having heaps of fun looking back through old articles. I've found some really interesting stuff (see Miss Minnesota USA for the case of the theiving beauty queens, for example) and it's just interesting to see what states have the most articles.

Anyway enough babal... thanks for doing the linking! -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 19:54, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

I'm going to try to respond to all the rest of this at once....

• I'm afraid that the additional categories may lead to some overcategorization. All the state delegates are on the corresponding articles, I would probably be more in favor of making it easier to navigate among the state articles (Miss Virginia, Miss Virginia USA, Miss Virginia Teen USA) via a navigational box. I would be happy to try to design one if you want. I would make it a template that would use a parameter, so that each one doesn't need to be created individually.
• I'll hold off on the wikilinking until you get some more done, so I don't update each article for every year. I'll look for you to get to 1995, if you think of stopping before you get there, just let me know.
• I agree that the list is cleaner, and the additional detail can be found in other places. If you put the same detail in too many places, it just means that you have to update it in more places if it changes or a correction comes along.
• That stuff going on over in Minnesota is crazy... lol

--After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 01:37, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

It's always great to get a second opinion :) Thanks for the offer of a navigational box, I think that sounds fantastic. Perhaps one that linked the Miss & Teen articles but also the Miss America state pageant? Will leave it up to you. I also prefer the list and have continued to use that style (it doesn't take as long :P). I just completed Miss USA 1998 and got part-way through 1997 (will return to that soon). I was really pleased with the 1998 article because I was able to find some really great sources. Will use Factiva to go back and try to source the others. Thanks again for the help and suggestions... you really are fantastic! -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 01:41, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

OK. I've created {{State pageantry}} and put it on Miss Alabama USA. It could probably look better, but I'm still learning that side of things, at any rate it is a start. I'll let you take a look at it before I add it to the other articles. I've set it up to work pretty simply, so you can change the format as much as you want and the data should remain the same. Please feel free to make MAJOR improvements. After you take a crack at it, I can populate it onto all the articles. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 03:32, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! I've played around a wee bit... changed the colour scheme so it matches other templates and also played with the headings... the one thing I wasn't too sure about was the way that the heading and the article name looked exactly the same so have tried using italics to differentiate a bit more... you're welcome to revert back if you don't like it. I had one thought... is it worth at this time creating an article for each of the Miss America's Outstanding Teen state pageants? Because if were were looking at doing that at some point that should also go on the template. I started with Alabama, didn't mind many sources and didn't find easy ways of finding the state lists so gave up... but when I went back to Factiva I realised that some of the girls/state pageants had attracted some press coverage. I guess the pageant is still in its infancy so notability could be an issue but in my opinion I think it would be worth setting up articles for each now. Besides... we just got the first MAOTeen/Miss Teen USA crossover this year. Anyway I'll have a look at creating an article for one or two, let you have a look at them, and see what you think. The issue with MAOTeen is that it was preceded by a number of unofficial teen pageants: I think the articles should just cover the previous two official state titleholders. Anyway... I've been babballing again! (and I still haven't learnt to spell the word :P) -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 05:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Scratch that above comment... I just realised Pageant Almanac has all the info we need. I've decided I'll go ahead. Hopefully once I've got a few done you might be able to weave your magic like you did with the others! -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 05:07, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

OK, I've changed to it add the new set of articles, and put the Teen's below the Miss's. I started to try to create an if statement to figure out if the MAOT article existed and then select one of two templates with either 3 or 4 articles, but figured that you will probably create all of the new MAOT articles so quickly, that if would be obsolete soon. With this in mind, I think we can just put up with the redlinks for a short time, if you don't mind. I'll start to add them to all the articles. Since I'm not going to subst them, if we make more changes to the template, if will just update the pages dynamically. P.S. I don't mind your "babbling"... ;-) --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 13:13, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! Brilliant as usual :) I've already started the MAO Teen articles (see Miss Alabama's Outstanding Teen... the rest are blue on the template). What do you think? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PageantUpdater (talk • contribs) 21:15, 4 March 2007 (UTC).

I think that these are a good start. I've done some of my typical gnome like work on them and added the new template. I'm glad that you cleaned up that Oklahoma article. Over time, we may need to figure out how to add some info about some of the preceding pageants. For example, if you go to the official site for Oklahoma's teen, it mentions the old pageant which was won in 2004 by the current Miss America; but we can build all this up over time. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 04:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Nicole Manske image

FYI. I just issued a reason for Nicole Manske's image (Image:NicoleManske.jpg) by changing the copyright tag from promotional to fair use and expanding its reason for its fair use. Is this valid enough for the fair use dispute to be removed? Please advise. Chris 14:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

replied here --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 22:13, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

I moved it out of the information box into its own separate area. All I was doing was putting the image into the Beauty Pageant infobox. That is all. I hope this helps. Chris 01:41, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Thank you on this. I owe you one. Chris 16:53, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

I decided to speedy delete the Manske image on the basis of what I saw with the comments that both you and PageantUpdater made along with an unsuccessful fair use image was mot properly loaded. I wish they would make these things clearer on this to avoid the amount of hulabaloo that we have to go through on this. Chris 23:55, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Re: Are you here

Hello. I hope that I'm not disturbing you.... I just happened on your page and noticed that you are on an extended wikibreak, but it looks like you are editing some. I hope that you have returned and just haven't removed the notice. I was also gone for a while due to some personal issues, but I've been back for a bit now. I remember good interactions with you, so I hope that you are not gone. At any rate, I wish you well, and if you desire to not be disturbed, I'll apologize for intruding. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 03:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for the message. I did desire not to be disturbed for various reasons, but I'm back now - I'm just not likely to be so involved with the meta side of things. Your words were very nice to read so thank you again. --kingboyk 09:49, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Chris Wheeler toupee guy

Done : ) AdamBiswanger1 03:43, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

This guy is getting really annoying, isn't he? Anyway, I protected Howard Eskin for a while, and I blocked him for 1 week. Hopefully this'll do the trick. Thanks for keeping me updated on the situation AdamBiswanger1 16:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Re:Category:Beauty Pageant Winners

Are you able to do all the necessary moves without a bot, because if so then I can simply remove it from CFD/W and let you do the moves, subcats etc. And then if you let me know I can delete the miscapitalised Category:Beauty Pageant Winners once Category:Beauty pageant winners is created and populated. Thanks, Tim! 17:36, 8 March 2007 (UTC)

That's cool with me, thanks for putting the effort in :) Tim! 17:34, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Old category now deleted. Tim! 07:55, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks!

I just wanted to thank you for answering my questions about the technical aspects of the renaming process. I eventually realized that changes were continuing to be made and that the task would eventually be completed. You provided a very helpful answer.Vbd (talk) 02:56, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

You are very welcome. I am happy to have helped you. If you ever think that I can provide any other assistance, please don't hesitate to let me know. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 03:13, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your help on the Nan Kelley article

Thanks for your help on the Nan Kelley article. It earned a DYK today. I greatly appreciate it. Chris 02:48, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

• Thanks for removing the extra birthday userbox on my User page as well. Chris 15:49, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Infoboxes for Miss Universe?

Hi! I just noticed that someone has been putting infobox-type things on the Miss Universe year pages (see Miss Universe 2006). I think this is a GREAT idea but I think an actual template needs to be created (and there is some obvious formatting issues) and then subst-ed onto each page. Any chance you know how to do this? What do you think of the template fields? I think it's pretty good, not too sure about having withdraws/returns/newbies etc but I guess it's informative. Anyway see what you think... -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 22:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Hmm. That a curious one. For starters, I'm not sure that the copyrighted image is fair-use in an infobox like that. You have more image experience, what do you think? As far as the infobox itself, I'm starting to get OK with formatting and variables, so I think that I could give it a go. I don't think that I would subst it, I would make it like {{Pageant titleholder bio}} in that the variables would be specified in the template call. Let me know what you think about that and the image and then I'll try to get started. I could call it {{Beauty pageant}} and it could possibly be used other pageants (like Miss USA xxxx, Miss Teen xxxx, ....) as well. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 00:59, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

I agree that the logo shouldn't be used... and also that basing the new infobox on "Pageant titleholder bio" sounds like a great idea. It definitely needs to have the pageant title (e.g. "Miss Universe 2006") in bold at the top, which the current template seems to lack. Good luck working something out! -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 01:08, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Great job! I put it in Miss Universe 2006 and it looks great! -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 02:39, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

You may have been too fast (or not).... check out User:After Midnight/Sandbox please. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 02:42, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Ok well I think it looks great. I guess the one thing that looks a bit funny is the "represented" bit... esp for USA. Perhaps rather than linking Miss Kentucky USA straight out we could pipe link it with "Kentucky"? One other thing... do we really need the "placements" field...? I'm not so sure. One thing I think it does need is an "Awards" field (Congeniality & Photogenic only). Anyway info we need for this (apart from number of delegates) is practically all available on Pageant Almanac so it should be easy to fill in! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PageantUpdater (talk • contribs) 02:46, 11 March 2007 (UTC).

Are you saying that you don't like the word "represented" or the way it displays? Piping the link works just fine, so go ahead and do that if you want. The placements is there since it was on the original. If you lave any field blank (or just exclude it) then it won't show up, but it will still be there for other pageants that may want it. I'll add congeniality and photogenic parameters in a minute and then I'll change my sandbox for you to take another look. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 02:52, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

It's looking good. One thing I'd suggest is changing "interval acts" to "entertainment". What do you think about Congeniality & Photogenic? I initially thought it was a good idea but now aren't so sure. Could it be possible to put a bold heading "Awards" on the left and then have Congeniality and Photogenic under hat as they are now but not in bold? -- PageantUpdater • talk | contribs | esperanza 05:03, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Just woke up, and I see that you made the change for entertainment, but not for the awards. Please let me know if you decided that you like it as is, or if you just wanted me to try my magic to make it do what you want. I think that I know what to do for that, but I won't be able to do anything for the next few hours. If you let me know of any additional changes, I can try to make them all work this afternoon. --After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 11:50, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Re:Popups translation

Re:Popups translation

Thanks, now I understand :). --Nux (talk) 19:35, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Portal: Current events/Sports

As a regular contributer to this article, I'd like to see your opinion in the discussion on the talk page. --Nitsansh 23:47, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

My RfA

Hi After Midnight. It will be midnight here in three hours, and time to thank you for your review of my RfA. Rest assured that I have heard every voice loud and clear during the discussion, and will strive to use the mop carefully and responsibly. Thank you for your support. Please don't hesitate to give me constructive criticism anytime. Xiner (talk, email) 01:17, 14 March 2007 (UTC)