User talk:Bossanoven/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Bossanoven. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 7 |
Beatles album templates
Hello Hoops, we're a little confused as to the intention behind some templates that you created a few a months ago—please could you comment here? TIA, Uniplex (talk) 13:10, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
More categories stuff
Ok, maybe I'm missing something. But it looks like you first removed the category "Nazi leaders assassinated by the Allies" from a whole bunch of articles [1], [2], [3], [4], and then removed its sub-categories [5] [6] and [7] and then nominated the category for speedy deletion based on the fact that ... it was empty! After you had emptied it out.
Why?
The original category seems like a viable and perfectly justifiable category so I'm not sure why are you emptying it (and then trying to speedy delete it). Additionally I think that if you do not think that it was a "right" category then the appropriate venue is CFD. I'm not 100% sure that this works the same way, but this just looks a lot like deleting a whole bunch of content from an article and then submitting it for a PROD based on the fact that there is nothing in there.
At the very least, this should be discussed. Can you please undo your removal of the category from the relevant articles, of the sub-categories from the category, and take off the speedy tag on the category's page, and initiate discussion somewhere? Thanks.Volunteer Marek (talk) 05:08, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- The Category:Assassinated Nazis is the same thing. I moved each article that was in the category nominated for deletion to this other said category. It's a fairly simple move and not one that I anticipated would generate much discussion.Hoops gza (talk) 21:23, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- On a related note, I think that Category:Nazis assassinated by Polish resistance is too fine of a categorization, unless you expect it to grow significantly beyond four articles total. There were not that many Nazis who were assassinated such as to create a need for sub-categorization.Hoops gza (talk) 21:35, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- "Nazi leaders assassinated by the Allies" is obviously a subset of "Assassinated Nazis". Some Nazis were assassinated by Germans, while others were assassinated by the Allies. I don't see why we can't be specific here. Where is the proposed deletion nomination (and I'm not talking about your speedy nomination, made AFTER you've emptied the category out)?
- And i disagree with regard to Category:Nazis assassinated by Polish resistance. There were actually quite a large number that were assassinated, and yes, I do expect the category to grow beyond 4, though it may take some time.Volunteer Marek (talk) 16:15, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
- Of the Nazis for whom we have Wikipedia articles, almost all of those who were assassinated were assassinated by Allies (assuming that Polish resistance is considered amongst the Allies). And what constitutes an Ally is not sufficiently well defined so as to make it a good subcategory. The main point of this whole categoy and any potential subcats is to point out which Nazis were assassinated, not other stuff which is closer to being superfluous. Anyways, I think that "Polish resistance" is a better subset than "Allies" and looks like a good category to keep.Hoops gza (talk) 20:06, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
- Emptying categories and then nomination for deletion as empty is considered a violation of the guidelines for deleting categories. This should be done at WP:CFD and see if consensus supports an action like this. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:51, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Hering, Gottlieb.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hering, Gottlieb.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Secret account 05:00, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
youtube as a source
Hello, you left a complaint on my talk page about using youtube as a source. I don't know if you took the time to look at the information I referenced, but it comes from two Polish gentlemen who have made the research of Polish cabaret and its performers, history, composers etc. their life work. They have collections unparalleled in the world as far as I can see and their knowledge is exhaustive. However, they do not choose to write books on the subject. Their chosen way of sharing is to write wonderful glosses on the historic recordings they put up on youtube. I have corresponded with them and feel they have information which is available currently in no other form whatsoever. Jane Peppler (talk) 11:37, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Helpful info. on Nebe, Heess, etc.
Hoops, check out this link to helpful pages as to articles you have been working on of late: [8] . Kierzek (talk) 20:31, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Architects who died in Nazi concentration camps
Category:Architects who died in Nazi concentration camps, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Elekhh (talk) 10:58, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
CSD G8 on SS personnel assigned to Auschwitz
Hi, I wanted to let you know that I removed your WP:CSD G8 from SS personnel assigned to Auschwitz. The redirect target exists, so I don't see how G8 can apply. Monty845 20:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- I disagree with your opinion that the redirect should be deleted based on its name, but if you think it should be, WP:RFD is the proper place to raise the issue. Monty845 20:11, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- First, your reason for requesting deletion does not meet the criteria of WP:CSD G8. Second it is common for redirects to point to target articles that do not exactly match the name of the redirect, but do represent a topic close enough that the user being redirected may find it helpful to have been redirected instead of finding nothing at all. Monty845 20:20, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- While I disagree with your opinion on the distinctiveness of the two subjects, even if your correct, WP:CSD G8 is not the correct way to delete the redirect. G8 is for cases such as a redirect to a page that has never existed, or to a page that has been deleted, not for disputes over the merit of a redirect. The proper place to request the deletion of a redirect because you disagree with the connection between the redirect and its target is at Redirects for Discussion. Monty845 20:37, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Please refrain from adding
{{db-g8}}
to SS personnel assigned to Auschwitz. This is highly disruptive and is a block-worthy offense. You've been around long enough to know what can be requested under G8 and what cannot. If you believe the redirect should be deleted, request that at WP:RFD. Do not re-add this tag. -FASTILY (TALK) 03:57, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
- First, your reason for requesting deletion does not meet the criteria of WP:CSD G8. Second it is common for redirects to point to target articles that do not exactly match the name of the redirect, but do represent a topic close enough that the user being redirected may find it helpful to have been redirected instead of finding nothing at all. Monty845 20:20, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Grabner, Maximilian.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Grabner, Maximilian.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hoops gza (talk) 03:13, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
We previously had some discussion about images in List of major perpetrators of the Holocaust and I notice that since that time many of the image you have added use the copyright tag {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} but you have failed to comply with all the terms of that tag. Read it carefully and you will see what I mean, otherwise those image will need to be nominated for deletion. Good luck ww2censor (talk) 03:56, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- Hoops, what you are doing is vandalism by placing images with valid reasons to be used on Wikipedia, and replacing them with (yes much better quality images) using garbage reasons. You deleted File:Franz Stangl.jpg which had a valid use reason, and replaced it with File:Stangl, Franz.jpg claiming its a 70+ year old photo as reason for public domain. It is not 70+ years old, that was the reason why the previous photo was not so shiny and glossy, so it would comply with fair use. Stop ripping photos and claiming they are 70+ years old and putting proper photos under speedy deletion. Cheers! Meishern (talk) 20:57, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Stangl, Franz.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Stangl, Franz.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.
If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Meishern (talk) 21:08, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
Paul schmidt
I noticed you added a deathdate for him , could you add a source for it? Or tell me what makes you certain, because as i mentioned in the talk he was interviewed in the 70s'
Saw the source you added , but can you elaborate since i still dont understand how he could of died in 1970 when the World at War was on air in 1973 and most of the interviews are from 1971-1973. User:Goldblooded (Talk/Discuss)(Complain) 17:18, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Höss, Rudolf.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Höss, Rudolf.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Pburka (talk) 20:22, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Admin Board Notice
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -OberRanks (talk) 22:05, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
- Alright, so, while we've come this far, it's time for a final warning.
- You're a good editor. The majority of your contributions are great. But the continued edit warring, messy copyright work, and process disruption is really starting to become a problem. A block-worthy problem. Please tread lightly from now on - some people would have you blocked as it is. I'd like to extend you a final chance. Take more care with your edits and abide by policy. If you come across something you're not quite clear on, feel free to ask myself or one of the many other senior editors for guidance. I'd much prefer to help you out with something rather than end up blocking you. Please, take this seriously. Thank you, m.o.p 04:18, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
- Hi again. I was just looking at your move of Joachim Peiper - I assume your intent was to use the more-commonly presented name? m.o.p 03:29, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Response
Oh right thats fair enough, i was just being curious :) Also another good history documentary series is World War II : The Complete History , its regulary shown on SKY UK on discovery and discovery history channels, i think its rather underrated by many and the music in it is really spooky and adds to the atmosphere, if youd watch it you'd know what i mean. Although dont get the DVD set of it because for some reason the narrator is different to the one on the TV series and it doesnt give the same amount of emphasis (and also the script is a tad different as well) User:Goldblooded (Talk/Discuss)(Complain) 14:34, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Treblinka concentration camp timeline
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Hoops gza (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
- Uhh, unless I'm confused it looks like you just nominated your own REDIRECT for deletion. Why? Volunteer Marek 03:56, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
List of compositions by Scott Joplin
Hi there, Many thanks for your message on my talk page; I have put a version of the list article in my user space to experiment with, mainly because I wanted to try some things out and see what worked. I'm honestly not sure about having separate tables for the compositions. There are arguments for having separate tables of the Joplin rags, rather than the songs or the Waltzes say. That's why I wanted to have a play and see what I thought.
That and I realise the Lead is not really very good and needs going over, so a separate space to in which to tinker with it was sensible until I had something in better shape to make public.
I've had a look at the table as it is on the page: well done on organising it so it is sort-able. I agree with you that a table which can be sorted is probably better than numerous separate tables. Ben (Major Bloodnok) (talk) 23:43, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Hoops gza. I am not sure why you are reverting my improvements to the above template. At first I thought you might be objecting to my removal of the colours, so I put them back in. But now you have reverted me again, saying the template is "too long." However, on my set-up (Toshiba laptop running Firefox 8) the two versions look the same, but my version accomplishes the same task in 1100 fewer bites. Could you please explain to me what differences you are seeing between the two versions? Thanks. --Dianna (talk) 04:06, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Streets and squares named after Adolf Hitler
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Streets and squares named after Adolf Hitler. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - List of streets and squares named after Hitler. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of streets and squares named after Hitler - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Msruzicka (talk) 02:57, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Squares named after Hitler
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Squares named after Hitler. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - List of squares named after Adolf Hitler. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at List of squares named after Adolf Hitler - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Msruzicka (talk) 06:07, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Hoops: A. Bormann was of general rank in the NSKK only. It was his brother Martin who was of general rank in the SS. So I took off the cat you added to Albert Bormann. Kierzek (talk) 21:50, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In Siegfried Aufhäuser, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Union leader (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Removing Speedy at Ernst Stengelin
Hi Hoops gza, you recently removed a deletion tag from Ernst Stengelin. Because Wikipedia policy does not allow the creator of the page to remove speedy deletion tags, an automated program has replaced the tag. Although the deletion proposal may be incorrect, removing the tag is not the correct way for you to contest the deletion, even if you are more experienced than the nominator. Instead, please use the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. Remember to be patient, there is no harm in waiting for another experienced user to review the deletion and judge what the right course of action is. As you are involved, and therefore potentially biased, you should refrain from doing this yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 06:16, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Ernst Stengelin. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 06:44, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Another Nazi for your running list - Ludwig Stumpfegger
Ludwig Stumpfegger joined the SS on 2 June 1933 and the NSDAP on 1 May 1935. In August 1937 Stumpfegger obtained his doctor's degree. A. Joachimsthaler, 1999, p. 290. Kierzek (talk) 02:25, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Abkindern for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abkindern is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abkindern until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gsingh (talk) 06:00, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Feierabendgestaltung
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Feierabendgestaltung requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AKS (talk) 05:17, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Franz Albert Rum.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Franz Albert Rum.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:24, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Ehrlinger, Erich.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ehrlinger, Erich.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:13, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Bierkamp, Walter.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bierkamp, Walter.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:14, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Willi Mentz.png
Thank you for uploading File:Willi Mentz.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:21, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Dubois, Werner 2.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dubois, Werner 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Schütt, Hans-Heinz.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Schütt, Hans-Heinz.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:28, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Unverhau, Heinrich.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Unverhau, Heinrich.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:28, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Jührs, Robert.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jührs, Robert.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:32, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Juhrs, Robert.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Juhrs, Robert.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Ittner, Alfred.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ittner, Alfred.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Alfred Ittner 2.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alfred Ittner 2.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:36, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Bolender, Kurt.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bolender, Kurt.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Wirth, Christian in uniform.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wirth, Christian in uniform.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Münzberger, Gustav.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Münzberger, Gustav.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Stadie, Otto.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stadie, Otto.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Suchomel, Franz.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Suchomel, Franz.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Josef Oberhauser and Kurt Franz.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Josef Oberhauser and Kurt Franz.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Josef Oberhauser at his trial.png
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Josef Oberhauser at his trial.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Horn, Otto.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Horn, Otto.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Eichmann, Adolf.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eichmann, Adolf.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:33, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:Eichmann, Adolf.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Eichmann, Adolf.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:20, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:Hoops gza/Holocaust France
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Hoops gza (talk) 01:25, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Self-Published Sources
You have repeatedly, in a slow-motion edit war, restored citations to self-published amateur WWII buff websites, some of which are defunct, as references in the List of Nazis articles. Please familiarize yourself with WP:SPS and WP:RS. Self-published sources, no matter how well researched, are not to be used as sources in Wikipedia articles. Do not restore these citations yet again. Instead, find reliable sources published by independent, reputable publishers in lieu of these deleted sources.Fladrif (talk) 16:57, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- Now you really are just edit warring, something you have been repeatedly warned about previously. Which part of WP:SPS and WP:RS don't you understand?Fladrif (talk) 17:01, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Another for your List of Nazis
Franz Josef Huber (22 January 1902–30 January 1975) was a SS general in the Gestapo who rose to the rank of SS-Brigadeführer und Generalmajor der Polizei; his Nazi Party member number was: 4,583,151 and the SS number 107,099. Ailsby, C. (1997), SS: Roll of Infamy, p. 78. Kierzek (talk) 14:35, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 6
Hi. When you recently edited Timeline of deportations of French Jews to death camps, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Saint-Sulpice, Bergen-Belsen and Noé (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
You are nominated the above for renaming and then said you are now convinced it should be kept. I would suggest that you withdraw the nomination (for example by striking it out using <s></s>), which will probably lead to an admin closing the nomination. Peterkingiron (talk) 12:21, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Timeline of Treblinka
Please take a look at my expansion of Gniewoszów, Masovian Voivodeship with added history of the Jewish community along with new wp:rs references. The Holocaust Memorial Museum Encyclopedia says that on August 19–20 approximately 5,000 Jews were shipped in Holocaust trains from Gniewoszów to Zwoleń transit ghetto nearby. The remaining 1,000 Jews were sent to their deaths in Treblinka extermination camp on November 15, 1942. In your Timeline of Treblinka the second date and number of inmates matches perfectly, but the first one (transport dated September 15, 1942) seems not fully explained given the above quoted statistics. Thanks in advance for taking a closer look at it. Poeticbent talk 16:58, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Hoops gza (talk) 22:19, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Suicides by cyanide poisoning
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Hoops gza (talk) 22:31, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
German pronounciation requests
Hey Hoops gza,
I'll pronounce the following persons for you in the next days: Joseph Goebbels, Amon Leopold Goeth and Arthur Liebehenschel. But unfortunately, I won't make a pronounciation of Hermann Göring, because there's already a good one on the page, and I won't make one of Reinhard Heydrich, because his second name "Tristan" has got an "s" that would sound bad, because my microphone (I've got an old one) makes s-sounds to a lisped sound. I hope, you'll find another person, who'll pronounce him for you.
Greeting, RaveDog (talk) 01:38, 11 April 2012 (CET)
- Dunno why, but my microphone isn't doing the lisped sound anymore. So I'll make the pronounciation of Reinhard Heydrich, too.
Greeting, RaveDog (talk) 01:46, 11 April 2012 (CET)
- Hey Hoops gza,
I made your new pronounciation requests, except of Rudolf Höss because I dunno how to pronounce his surname. The problem is the "ß" because in names it depends. Greetings, RaveDog (talk) 22:55, 19 April 2012 (CET)
Nazi Party List references
Hi Hoops
I received your message on list references, I will indeed be able to provide a note for each entry - I'll do that by extracting an existing reference from inside each article that best suits and then update the list. Ultracobalt (talk) 00:57, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
I finished adding references with page numbers, over half are from from Klee. One comes from a book that I do not have the exact page # for, Heinrich Schmidt (politician), however as Kreisleiter and SA member, he would be required to be an NSDAP member also. I hope these references are sufficient. Best Regards Ultracobalt (talk) 20:44, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 13
Hi. When you recently edited Albert Speer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Berghof (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi Hoops, no problem. I've made a start on it at least. More to follow. Cheers. --Bermicourt (talk) 20:02, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- Translation completed and I've tracked down some of the links to Bernburg that really referred to this place and have amended them. There may be more out there though. --Bermicourt (talk) 20:56, 13 April 2012 (UTC)
- I'm happy for you to suggest occasional articles for translation, but because it's v time-consuming, I generally only take on those in which I have an interest (mainly aspects of the geography and history of Germany, occasionally Austria) and when I'm not working on other articles. --Bermicourt (talk) 06:10, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Speedy deletion nomination of Aumeier
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page that you created was tagged as a test page and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Hoops gza (talk) 21:58, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Belzec Trial
Hi Hoops, I'm interested in this one and will give it a bash when I'm back on home turf. Cheers. --Bermicourt (talk) 12:06, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
- This is now done - please feel free to check it over. Some of the translation involved legal terms that I'm not totally familiar with. I also didn't expand on current plans for a retrial as that could be sensitive. --Bermicourt (talk) 13:20, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
There is nothing in the article to explain this category - before categorising people as such any evidence should be added to the article
I am not suggesting that Walter Warlimont was not a Nazi but can you please appreciate the risks in categorising anybody or anything with a category unsupported by anything in the article being categorised? Please add your evidence of party membership to the article. Best Wishes. S a g a C i t y (talk) 08:24, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
Eduard David
Hi Hoops, yikes! That is a long article! I'm still finishing Child euthanasia in Nazi Germany and may do some related stuff. However, I could do a summary of the German article that will be a start. Are you a historian? --Bermicourt (talk) 10:21, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Translation request complete
Hi Hoops... per your request I finished the translation of Franz Suchomel from German wiki. It's ready for your expansion - I'll let ya know when I finish the other article. -- Ultracobalt (talk) 19:07, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
- Finished Anton Thumann, and found a good infobox on the Swedish wiki to include. Regards --Ultracobalt (talk) 21:09, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Krüger, Friedrich-Wilhelm.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Krüger, Friedrich-Wilhelm.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Darkwind (talk) 00:07, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Karl August Frenzel.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Karl August Frenzel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Darkwind (talk) 00:29, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Image notices
Sorry about the multiple PUF listings. I'm going through files tagged with {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} and part of checking those images before moving them to Commons is verifying the image license. {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} contains a note saying it is insufficient on its own to make the file public domain because the US doesn't have any author-disclosure law. If any more of these images come up while I'm doing random files out of the move-to-Commons categories, I may have to list them at PUF as well. —Darkwind (talk) 00:31, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Lorenz Hackenholt.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lorenz Hackenholt.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Bulwersator (talk) 17:04, 30 May 2012 (UTC)