DRCNSINDIA

Welcome

Hello, DRCNSINDIA, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents / Department directory

• The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
• The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

DRCNSINDIA, good luck, and have fun. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 13:45, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. DRCNSINDIA (talk) 17:18, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Djm-leighpark (talk) 22:46, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

So I'm not guilty sir. Thank you🇮🇳DRCNSINDIA (talk) 06:11, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Multiple account issues

Hello, DRCNSINDIA, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as NS Dibyojyoti (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 15:37, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Sir, NS Dibyojyoti (talk · contribs) is my senior incharge in SSDS (our company) and he has requested me in joining Wikipedia for correcting issues and take place after him. So he can't continue contributing Wikipedia. So he asked me to care after his contributions and drafts he made. My name is Nagarjuna Sagar Diyank. And his name is Dibyojyoti Roy Chowdhury, even we born in same place. I'm an employeer. Please don't ask me more on our personal matter and we are not misusing any rules in this year. But if you disagree on our connections if might create a problem. Please think once again and review once again and i will do the necessary work.🇮🇳DRCNSINDIA (talk) 15:51, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Off-wiki collaboration is generally not allowed but, if you don't edit the same articles, it shouldn't be an issue. --RegentsPark (comment) 16:17, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Ok that's good for me. Thank you for helping me.🇮🇳DRCNSINDIA (talk) 04:19, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

What does your company do?

Thanks. Doug Weller talk 13:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

I'm working on SSDS which works on small-scale work. Say Electronic transport department. That's I can say.🇮🇳DRCNSINDIA (talk) 13:45, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manoj Verma, IPS (November 12)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Praxidicae was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoj Kumar Verma

Praxidicae (talk) 13:34, 12 November 2020 (UTC)

Ribbons

Hi, there was a consensus not to add ribbons in India related biography articles. See this. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:02, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2020

Hello, I'm AafiOnMobile. I noticed that you recently removed content from Eastern Railway zone without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ─ The Aafī on Mobile (^talk) 21:26, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Half Barnstar
	You have praised me for your contributions. D. ROY CHOWDHARY (talk) 15:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dinesh Trivedi took oath as railway minister 2011-06-12.png

A tag has been placed on File:Dinesh Trivedi took oath as railway minister 2011-06-12.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 19:11, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Epic Barnstar

		The Epic Barnstar
		Great work on subcontinent related articles. Zakaria1978 ښه راغلاست (talk) 23:27, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Thank you your exellency Zakaria 🇮🇳DRCNSINDIA (talk) 04:38, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ministry of Sports and Youth Affairs (West Bengal)

Hello DRCNSINDIA,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ministry of Sports and Youth Affairs (West Bengal) for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 17:01, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

There's nothing stopping you from rewriting this article as long as the rewritten version isn't a copyright violation. You need to rewrite the text from scratch in your own words, don't start with the text you copied from and make changes to it. Hut 8.5 17:43, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you 🇮🇳DRCNSINDIA (talk) 06:44, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Request for adminship

Hi, DRCNSINDIA. I see you recently transcluded a request for adminship. If I may, I would recommend that you withdraw the RfA or simply undo the transclusion, as adminship is generally given to editors with a very good understanding of Wikipedia's policies. Other editors are going to look at Ministry of Sports and Youth Affairs (West Bengal), a copyright violation from less than 24 hours ago, for instance, and conclude that you need a stronger understanding of policy. Please also read WP:NOTYET. You can still contribute to Wikipedia as much as you want, but I would recommend focusing on editing articles first for a while longer. All you need to do is revert this edit. Thank you, and please feel free to ask me if you have any questions. Enterprisey (talk!) 10:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

I'm going to move it back to the Wikipedia: namespace, because there's no reason it should be under the new title, but I guess it can stay blank. Please don't move it. Enterprisey (talk!) 10:32, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Enterprisey Sir, for your request I withdrawl my RfA. Please note me can you make me rollback rights.? because I'm bored of this Extended confirmed user for long time.🇮🇳DRCNSINDIA (talk) 10:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ministry of Youth Services and Sports (West Bengal)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ministry of Youth Services and Sports (West Bengal) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.wbyouthservices.gov.in/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 09:15, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

::::Fram (talk · contribs) hey, all sentences are not same like this. I have written this on my own. http://www.wbyouthservices.gov.in/ is a reference and I have explained it on my words. Since you are considering this for less references, you are nominating to delete this.🇮🇳DRCNSINDIA (talk) 09:29, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Much of the page does not currently seem to be in your words. Several extended pieces of text are shared word-for=word:

• "to improve and develop sports infrastructure in the State, as also to search and nurture sports talents"
• "Emphasis is also given to promote vulnerable sections like women, schedule tribes and schedule castes in sporting arena. With this object in view the sports department has given emphasis on creation of stadia chiefly in the districts and sub-divisional towns."
• "The Vivekananda Yuba BharatiKrirangan (VYBK) is one of the most important venues of this most prestigious tournament."
• "Sports department provides grants to the West Bengal State Council of Sports, a wing of this department for promotion and development of sports and games."
• "Keeping this in view, the Youth Services Department is trying to expand the opportunities for availing different kinds of training. Thousands of Student - Youths have been receiving Computer/ Vocational Training from the low cost YCTCs / YVTCs."

I hope this explains why the page has been been tagged for speedy deletion.Dsp13 (talk) 13:12, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Ok User:Dsp13 I will change it with new words and some points may be removed. But don't delete the article until I said to do so. Please respond my words to satisfy it. 🇮🇳DRCNSINDIA (talk) 14:57, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

You removed the speedy deletion tag, which you aren't supposed to do in any case, but certainly not when even some of the examples kindly provided by User:Dsp13 were still in the article word for word. The changes you made[1] could never be enough to remove the copyright violations. Simpy replacing a word here or there just turns it into close paraphrasing, which is just as bad. You need to write an article completely in your own words, writing your own sentences, creating a summary of the sources, not a partial or complete copy of it. Fram (talk) 17:10, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Hat collection

Hi DRCNSINDIA,

thanks for your interest in the stuff happening behind Wikipedia's scenes. The Task Center and the community portal contain helpful ideas that anyone, even without an account, can help with. The Signpost can be fun to read while diving into the meta areas.

That said, as I'm active at WP:PERM/R, I have noticed something.

• A request for the accountcreator permission, without experience in the account creation area. The account creation log is empty; you have not hit any limits before requesting their removal.
• A request for the rollback permission, without experience in the antivandalism area. The undo log of that time was almost empty.
• A request for the file mover permission, without experience in the file moving area. Neither on the English Wikipedia (almost no File/FileTalk contributions) nor on Wikimedia Commons (zero contributions outside the user page).
• A request for the page mover permission, clearly without even having read the relevant guideline, and without having gained much experience with regular page moves (see the comprehensive list of moves until that date).
• A request for adminship, which was immediately reverted for being very premature, and transcluded again until the problem was seemingly understood (Special:Diff/992075843).
• Another request for the rollback permission, justification: "because I'm bored of this Extended confirmed user for long time."
• Another request for the rollback permission, still without experience in the antivandalism area. Not a single "undo" of others' contributions happened since the first request (compare A and B).
• A request for the mass message sender permission, justified by a honest but concerning reason, "in order to increase my edits".

I guess not everyone is so honest about their motives, but honesty doesn't make bad motives better.

Please stop requesting any permissions for the next few months, and take the time to gain experience with article editing. You have expressed interest in antivandalism; perhaps that's an area you may like to help in. If you have carefully read Wikipedia:Vandalism, you may like to start by having a look at the Recent Changes special page and carefully reviewing what happens there. Most of the time, someone will already have reverted vandalism before you have identified it as such; this is normal at the start. Don't rush this, and don't mistake all disruptive editing for "vandalism". Familiarize yourself with basic policies (WP:V, WP:NOR, WP:BLP, WP:EW); accept others' criticism if you are criticized for your first steps in this area. Please take the opportunity to learn instead of rejecting others' advice.

One day, depending on how helpful your contributions in a specific area of Wikipedia are, someone may kindly ask you to avoid the area in the future. This has now happened for "permission requests"; it may happen with other areas if you dive into them too quickly.

Frustration is understandable and human. But when you are frustrated about others' messages, please take the time to sleep over the issue. Don't hastily reply with emotions, as sadly seems to have happened in Special:Diff/992245030.

Best regards,
~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:18, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Drafts

That was a useful message you left for a new user who had written a draft article about himself. This is better wording which you are welcome to use: "Hi. Your draft has been deleted because the only place you are allowed to write about yourself is on [[User:[whatever their name is]|your own user page]]. You are not allowed to link to your Youtube channel, blog, Instagram account or any other such content or to promote your skills, services, publications, etc." Deb (talk) 14:12, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Thank you sir @Deb:. I have done my duty well enough. 🇮🇳GoWB🇮🇳 (ask me any questions) 14:17, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Manoj Verma

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Manoj Verma, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manoj Kumar Verma. (See section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) If a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 15:45, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

@Praxidicae:, it was reviewed then also you want to delete it. Make another discussion and do that according whether this article should be deleted or not. I had asked a admin but he delayed to tell it before creating so please remove the tag. Please give any response to me. 🇮🇳GoWB🇮🇳 (ask me any questions) 15:50, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Reviewed by who, exactly? Praxidicae (talk) 15:51, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

@Praxidicae: I requested a review to John B123. He told me to add more citations on the career section of the article. But no review message came yet. Then I told Fram for another review. No response from him yet. What can I do? 🇮🇳GoWB🇮🇳 (ask me any questions) 15:55, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

That doesn't mean it doesn't qualify for G4 or G11. Praxidicae (talk) 15:56, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Please delete as your wish but if I was blocked at any cost, please don't take it seriously. I will be fastreting before being blocked.@Praxidicae:. Please block NS Dibyojyoti because this account was hacked. I came to know it by one message in Multiple Account Issues. I'm informed to a user admin to block it but he didn't respond or blocked. I'm not in favoured with anyone. I saw one of his article review cancelled. So I thought I could improve it. But I'm not with anyone. 🇮🇳GoWB🇮🇳 (ask me any questions) 16:07, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Manoj Verma IPS IGP 2020.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Manoj Verma IPS IGP 2020.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:49, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Manoj Verma IPS IGP 2020.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Manoj Verma IPS IGP 2020.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file with a clearly invalid licensing tag; or it otherwise fails some part of the non-free content criteria. If you can find a valid tag that expresses why the file can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the current tag with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{Non-free fair use}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the file. If the file has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae (talk) 15:50, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DRCNSINDIA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm not the same person. I was traped by that hacked account of User:NS Dibyojyoti. The password was changed without any notice. So I told to User:Praxidicae who reviewed Draft:Manoj Verma, IPS and I requested to block that hacked account (User:NS Dibyojyoti), but he didn't respond yet. Now he says (Praxidicae) that I'm working with him for doing vandialism. It's false. Although he mention my username in his Userpage after his retirement. But the day when this account User:NS Dibyojyoti has moved Draft:Manoj Verma, IPS to Manoj Verma, IPS. I was angry. And then few weeks later after my withdrawn of RfA, he copied and mentioned the same thing in RfA. But he didn't rejected?withdrawn his request by himself. If I ping him, he will track me that's why he done this RfA for revenge. Please beleive me and unblock me so that I will take care of that situation next time. 🇮🇳GoWB🇮🇳 (ask me any questions) 15:06, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 15:21, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DRCNSINDIA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

User:Jpgordon please don't say like this. Your reason is 100% not satisfied to me. Are you avoiding me to unblock? Though I don't want to blame you. NS Dibyojyoti said that he has invited me for editing in Wikipedia and look after Draft:Manoj Verma, IPS work. If any msg came on him, he mentioned my nam eon his userpage for remaining work. See I didn't want to make any disrupt edits. This account has been hacked later and blocked but he didn't request any request. Notice also, he set me to traped by sending Wikilove to my talkpage. I didn't respond. I know that account tries to trick me, when it was hacked. Also I want to rename my username so that he cannot track me. Refer Multiple account issues on my talkpage for more details. 🇮🇳GoWB🇮🇳 (ask me any questions) 15:38, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

None of what you say is believable given your editing history and that of the other account, besides the link is also checkuser verified. —SpacemanSpiff 19:30, 16 December 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DRCNSINDIA (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

You all are bullshit to unblock. I have created a account which help me to edit on Wikipedia. No body can stop me. If you find that account and blocked it I will understand you are doing your job else you are called to be humiliated. It's 4 months I had created. Good bye I hope I would never see you again. Alwida!!!! 😢😢😢😊😊☺☺ 🇮🇳GoWB🇮🇳 (ask me any questions) 04:27, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. If you are going to continue to violate our policies, there is nothing more to be done here, so I am removing talk page access. 331dot (talk) 09:33, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Manoj Verma IPS IGP 2020.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Manoj Verma IPS IGP 2020.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 331dot (talk) 09:34, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rajib Banerjee TMC 2020.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rajib Banerjee TMC 2020.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Department of Co-operation (West Bengal)

Hello, DRCNSINDIA. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Department of Co-operation (West Bengal), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 29 October 2021 (UTC)