User talk:Fox/December 2010
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Fox. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Signpost: 6 December 2010
- News and notes: ArbCom tally pending; Pediapress renderer; fundraiser update; unreferenced BLP drive
- WikiLeaks: Repercussions of the WikiLeaks cable leak
- WikiProject report: Talking copyright with WikiProject Copyright Cleanup
- Features and admins: Birds and insects
- Arbitration report: New case: World War II
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
WP:ERRORS
Glad someone noticed! BencherliteTalk 01:21, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
- Only if someone says something wrong. Until then, either get back to where you once belonged or let it be. BencherliteTalk 01:26, 8 December 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 December 2010
- Rencontres Wikimédia: Wikimedia and the cultural sector: two days of talks in Paris.
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Algae
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Election report: The community has spoken
- Arbitration report: Requested amendment re Pseudoscience case
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
List of UK Christmas Number 1s
Hi. I want to let you know that I've reverted your edit on the UK Number 1s page. I've put my rationale on the talk page there, but, briefly, I think the information you deleted is important. I hope a consensus can be reached there. Thanks for helping the article. All the best. Boleslaw (talk) 16:15, 14 December 2010 (UTC)DB
OK. That's fine by me if you see it as trivia that's not worthy of an encylopædia. I just noticed that two previous editors had put the film reference in the article. As I say, I've not watched this film. As there's now a section on the talk page, I hope a consensus will emerge. Boleslaw (talk) 00:39, 15 December 2010 (UTC)DB
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:51, 17 December 2010 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 December 2010
- News and notes: Article Alerts back from the dead, plus news in brief
- Image donation: Christmas gift to Commons from the State Library of Queensland
- Discussion report: Should leaked documents be cited on Wikipedia?
- WikiProject report: Majestic Titans
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: Motion passed in R&I case; ban appeals, amendment requests, and more
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Signpost: 27 December 2010
- Ambassadors: Wikipedia Ambassador Program growing, adjusting
- WikiProject report: WikiProject National Basketball Association (NBA)
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
WikiCup 2011
Things are changing, getting updated and stuff. I've updated the main page, the FAQ and the scoring page. Changes so far to the scoring: a small drop in DYK points (10 to 5), a small drop in GA points (40 to 30), removal of valued pictures (the project no longer exists), a small incentive to review good articles (2 points for fair sized reviews) and I have posted this thread to hopefully get something final in terms of the multipliers everyone has been talking about. Are you wanting to stick around as a judge for next year? J Milburn (talk) 21:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for the note. Myself and Ed were chatting about other possible judges, and we do have a few ideas. It'd be great to have you taking part, even if you drop out in an early round, just to make up numbers- I'll have another chat to Ed and see what we reckon. J Milburn (talk) 00:36, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- I was going to drop them notes this evening. J Milburn (talk) 00:39, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- If you're meaning flags, we've done away with that in an attempt to streamline and de-stress the whole OMG FLAGS thing. J Milburn (talk) 00:42, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- I was going to drop them notes this evening. J Milburn (talk) 00:39, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Regarding your revert; Do you have examples of breaking templates, or is this an assumption? Because the situation you describe (</b> closing ''') should never happen. See my test examples at Template talk:·#Bolding embedding test. — Edokter • Talk — 23:56, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Hello. You are being contacted because you have previously shown interest in the WikiCup but have not yet signed up for the 2011 WikiCup, which starts at midnight. It is not too late to sign up! The competition will remain open until at least January 31, and so it is not too late to enter. If you are interested, simply follow the instructions to add your username to the signup page, and a judge will contact you as soon as possible with an explanation of how to participate. The WikiCup is a friendly competition open to all Wikipedians, old and new, experienced and inexperienced, providing a fun and rewarding way to contribute quality content to Wikipedia. If you do not want to receive any further messages about the WikiCup, or you want to start receiving messages about the WikiCup, you may add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the WikiCup talk page or contact the judges directly. J Milburn and The ed17 06:47, 31 December 2010 (UTC)