H.al-shawaf

Takeover Defense Strategies

Hmm... currently all takeover defense strategies are grouped under Mergers and acquisitions. Is there a need to make a separate category for them? I'd love to hear your input on this. I'll also do some more research on PacMan Defense and see if I can come up with some cases. Ray 13:44, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps a subcategory? What do you think? --H.al-shawaf 20:54, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Accountancy

If you are interested in working in collaboration with Wikipedia members on improving the article Accountancy, you will be pleased to hear that the Accountancy task force has been set up and is seeking participants who can assist with the article's overhaul. Perhaps you would like to provide verifiable content on this subject matter, in which case your input could be invaluable. Alternatively we are also seeking participants who can help with the systematic sorting of related accountancy articles into meaningful categories, an activity that does not require undertaking research but will nonetheless help improve the quality of the article's links. Either way, the task force would like to hear from you! --Gavin Collins 12:32, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

B. Joseph White

Unfortunately, I don't have any reliable sources to cite, just the interview that I heard on WDWS radio here in CU with the student senator who claimed to have requested the documents. There may be sources, but I have not looked overly hard for them. -- Upholder (talk) 17:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

The Daily Illini describes a similar situation. It's entirely possible that the radio interview that I heard was about this incident. If you would like to rewrite that section to use the source, I would fully support that as I agree it should be supported by a reliable source. -- Upholder (talk) 20:25, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion

On your new article, you could put {{underconstruction}} or {{construction}}, which would result in

or

This way, admins won't delete it while you're editing. Just a thought. --Gp75motorsports ^{REV LIMITER} 16:01, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

List of UIUC people

In addition to reverting your edit, I dropped all names that were redlinked and uncitedm as being unable to pass [{WP:V]], and therefore unable to pass WP:NOTABLE. Please don't add them back until they can either have a wikiarticle (which mean they have passed WP:NOTABLE or you can find a reliable source to pass WP:V. Not having a wikipage or any kind of sources is a problem and just because it happens on other pages doesn't make it ok, per WP:OTHERSTUFF. You've obviously got a lot of interest in this, so I suggest coming up with either wikipages or reliable sources for people you want to add. :)Justinm1978 (talk) 16:45, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

True, but alumni is defined as "An alumnus (pl. alumni) according to the American Heritage Dictionary is "a male graduate or former student of a school, college, or university." [1] In addition, an alumna (pl. alumnae) is "a female graduate or former student of a school, college, or university." [2]". I would say that he qualifies as a former student. Justinm1978 (talk) 19:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Infobox images

I don't believe that you can easily resize images used in the infobox templates as they are constructed to be a consistent size. -- Upholder (talk) 17:31, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Hey

No problem. :) If you need any assistance with cats, let me know. --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 04:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Accountancy task force

Hello, this message is being sent to you since you are an interested participant of the Accountancy task force. This is just a heads-up that the task force has been expanded with new features and its main page modified. Now that the task force has assessed over 800 articles in its scope, a breakdown can be seen of the quality of articles. A new userbox can be added to your page, and if you know of a editor contributing to accounting articles, a welcoming template can be used to invite the editor to join the task force. If you haven't already, consider watchlisting the main discussion page. There is currently a discussion about adding a template to some main accounting topics that would benefit from input by other editors. Feel free to leave feedback on the discussion page for further improving these new features. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 07:33, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bruce P. Smith (academic)

The article Bruce P. Smith (academic) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:PROF. Adminstrative career is not a component of WP:PROF. Sole Google News item I found was a quote in somebody's obituary. h-index is about 5.

He's a published author. How thorough was your Google search? http://www.aspenpublishers.com/Product.asp?catalog_name=Aspen&product_id=0735562903&cookie_test=1 You'd be hard pressed to find anyone in the field of legal history that doesn't know who he is. Revert the deletion and I'll make the appropriate citations.H.al-shawaf (talk) 04:43, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 12:30, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Hello, H.al-shawaf. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Business/Accountancy_task_force#Renaming_the_Accountancy_Task_Force_to_Institute_of_Wiki_Accountants.
Message added 17:39, 11 March 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:H.al-shawaf/John E. Cribbet has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John E. Cribbet, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 20:54, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

John E. Cribbet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

• The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
• You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kevin Rutherford (talk) 04:23, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

You're invited: Art & Feminism Edit-a-thon

Art & Feminism Edit-a-Thon - In a city near you! - You are invited!

File:Csaky madonna.jpg

The first ever Art and Feminism Edit-a-thon will be held on Saturday, February 1, 2014 across the United States and Canada - including Chicago! Wikipedians of all experience levels are welcome to join! Any editors interested in the intersection of feminism and art are welcome. Experienced editors will be on hand to help new editors. Bring a friend and a laptop! Come one, come all! Learn more here! SarahStierch (talk) 05:37, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Hello, Good to know you are a lawyer too! Happy editing! Sign my Guestbook. The Pakistan (talk) 18:15, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, H.al-shawaf. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, H.al-shawaf. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:University of Illinois College of Business.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:University of Illinois College of Business.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Robert J. Swieringa for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Robert J. Swieringa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert J. Swieringa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --David Tornheim (talk) 08:53, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Lawyers and law students' signatures needed for Supreme Court amicus brief in favor of publishing the law

Hello, given your userbox I thought you might be interested in helping Carl Malamud's case for the public domain, crucial also for Wikisource: https://boingboing.net/2019/04/25/happy-law-day.html . Best regards, Nemo 21:06, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)