Hola!!

Chidi and Chika Nwaogu

edit

I notice the notability concern you put up on the page Chidi and Chika Nwaogu. I will appreciate that before you put up any concern, we talk about it first on the talk page of the article, and after we reach a conclusion, a concern can be placed. Thanks - Babajide.O — Preceding unsigned comment added by Babajide.O (talkcontribs) 14:10, 16 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sure!--Hola from mola (talk) 14:12, 16 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Mary Hartline

edit

You look at a 550 word article with five (5) separate, unrelated references cited, and you post it, "needs additional citations for verification"??? Get real... It's not like she hasn't been mostly out of the public spotlight for the last fifty years and more... GWFrog (talk) 14:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trade In Detectives, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CEX and Consoles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:ICT-Africa-logo.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:ICT-Africa-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:42, 6 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Scheiner Law Group for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scheiner Law Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scheiner Law Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.. Voceditenore (talk) 17:02, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scheiner Law Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Federal courts. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 9 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Trade In Detectives for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trade In Detectives is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trade In Detectives until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 12:28, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of HeatsProductions for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HeatsProductions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HeatsProductions until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 12:30, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Joseph Clough for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Clough is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Clough until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Orange Mike | Talk 12:33, 14 October 2014 (UTC)Reply