Ishwasafish

Random Comments!!!

Mmm... Tasty fish!--71.126.63.85 (talk) 22:57, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello, are ya a airplane forum user? If so, please tell me which forum and I might meet ya there. (Wrssrir (talk)

Sorry, I'm not.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

23:29, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

What is up dog? --Thisisthebestusernameever! (talk) 00:09, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

DL (Go Navy1/98.208.234.63 refs)

Hi there, I am a current employee of DAL and i am currently posting the references to my edits. Thanks.....Tony 98.208.234.63 (talk) 22:46, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi there, I have created an account and im getting ready to go back to work from a family leave but I am happy to say I have the resources saved onto my desktop and when I do have a spare moment on a layover or if I have a cancellation, Ill be happy to re-post them. 98.208.234.63 (talk) 05:44, 28 June 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Go Navy1 (talk • contribs)

a persuasive review

Hello, I noticed you recently tagged the Volkswagen Jetta article as containing persuasive review. Since this is kind of vague, I would like you to expand on your addition and suggest how you would improve the article. As it currently stands, the reviews information is from a variety of external sources and it isn't written in an especially positive or negative tone. Therefore I'd like to try and understand your perspective. --Analogue Kid (talk) 01:49, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

I can see how it might be encyclopedic, but mostly for models that are not in production anymore. From the article:

The fifth generation has received generally positive reviews. Nevertheless, some critics have complained that the car lost some of its distinctive European character with the redesign. Most reviewers found the ride to be firm and well controlled, but not always as forgiving as the previous generation. Handling was a strong point, with quick and precise steering and minimal body roll. Fit and finish received excellent marks, with reviewers noting the car felt very upscale. The front seats were firm but well liked, and the rear seat was roomy, in contrast to the cramped quarters in the fourth generation. Controls and displays were generally good.

There are reasons in there for some readers to be either be persuaded to buy or not to buy the car, even if it is written with NPOV.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

13:32, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

The Northville Public Schools article

Hey Ish, I like what you did to the Northville Public schools article. It is cool from The real mhking you know —Preceding unsigned comment added by The Real MhKing you know (talk • contribs) 14:54, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Delta Air Lines fleet

I have started a discussion at WP:AIRLINES if aircraft photos are "needed". Please feel free to add your thoughts to it. Apparently this was not discussed before and an anon IP went and made the change. Charmedaddict (talk) 05:44, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

NWA Airlink

Despite your insistance, Northwest Airlink does not exist as a brand any longer. The only place you may see it is painted on aircraft that have yet to receive the Delta livery, but even on those flights the crew will address you as "Delta Connection operated by XXX". Please stop correcting my edits.

Airport_master (talk) 01:15, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Even if they say "Delta Connection operated by X Airlines", that is what they do on NW and DL flights, but it has been discussed multiple times to leave those separate. Additionally, if you book a flight on delta.com, it says "Delta XXXX operated by X Airlines dba Northwest Airlink". I am starting a discussion on the DTW talk page here

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

01:35, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

I have started a discussion here at the Delta talk page. Charmedaddict (talk) 04:32, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Michigan ad

Now that I've got a bit of a break from work, still interested in that Michigan ad? :) Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP! :D} 18:52, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

That'd be great! A few suggestions (I'm a Michigan native): Everyone in Michigan can point to where they live on their hand (the mitten), Mackinac Island is a very popular vacation spot, most everyone I know has been there, there is a huge rivalry between MSU and U of M, most people don't know how to say 'Mackinac' correctly if they've never been (it's said Mackinaw), and you might want to add something about the auto industry and Motown. Please tell me when you've made the ad, thanks,

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

20:27, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Delta flights from Punta Cana to DTW and MSP

Hi Iswasafish! I am having a little trouble with DL/NW flights at Punta Cana International Airport. I looked up flights from PUJ to MSP/DTW. It says on each airline's website that the flights will be operated by Northwest Airlines. However, IP users continue to assume that NWA no longer exists as an airline and all of its flights are operated by Delta. Can you lok at that page? Also, I unsuccessfully explain to him/her that DL and NWA are still seperated at the moment but they keep assuming that they are not Northwest flights and that they are Delta flights. Thanks! B'ham35242 (talk) 03:17, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

I checked both airlines' timetables, and PUJ-MSP&DTW didn't even show up on DLs. Yes, DL and NW are still separate, even though some IPs insist upon them being one airline. I appreciate you adding the routes in on the NW article. Also, point any disagreeing IPs towards this discussion, where it has been thoroughly discussed without consensus. They can add their thoughts there. Basically the only users for separation is you, me, and Charmedaddict, who is unfortunately retired.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

13:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

I think only DTW-PUJ, and MSP-PUJ only exist on both airline's website but i don't know why now PUJ-DTW/MSP. Maybe its because its a Saturday only service. B'ham35242 (talk) 13:55, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

I meant as in DTW-PUJ and MSP-PUJ, but I couldn't find those routes on DLs timetables.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

13:57, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

But you did find those routes on NW's timetables. Since those routes are operated by NW? B'ham35242 (talk) 15:55, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I found them on NWs timetables.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

20:20, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

I have directed a disagreeing IP to the DL operated by NW section of DL talk page but refuses. Still assumes that they are merged. Stil putting it as "Delta operated by Northwest". 74.183.173.237 (talk) 01:18, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

I made a comment on their talk page... if they continue to change the page, we can have the page protected hopefully.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

01:38, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! I would watch the artciel for a few days. If he refuses to discuss this, then I would protect the article.74.183.173.237 (talk) 02:00, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Sounds good! Much obliged,

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

02:07, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Comair NW Airlink/DL Connection

Yes, Comair does fly for both NW Airlink and DL Connection. 74.183.173.237 (talk) 16:50, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Really? I was unaware. Thanks a lot,

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

23:52, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Focus city

I commented it out only on a temporary basis. Discussions normally last for a few days before things get changed. If the focus city is there then people will use it. If later the consensus is that it should not be there it will mean more work to remove the entries that have been added. If it's not usable, the current state, then there is really no extra work to add them later should consensus decide that it is needed. The way I see the discussion right now is a slight consensus to leaving out the focus city but it will be up to someone else to decide that. Enter CambridgeBayWeather, waits for audience applause, not a sausage 05:00, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Allegiant Air hub

Do you have a source for Vegas as the Allegiant Air hub? I have gone through several of the 10-x forms from the company and they don't appear to list any hubs. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:13, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

Here the hubs are the larger dots, these are also the ones that appear on the WP page. Also here they call those cities 'Major Travel Destination Cities'. To me, that sounds like another name for a hub, such as how NK uses bases in place of hubs.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

21:54, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

That is not the same as hubs. Better fits the definition of focus city. Maybe if there was a key for the colors on the page. Since Vegas is a different color, maybe that means something. I'll also add that Southwest does not have any hubs. So if this was the case with Allegiant, it would not be a surprise. So at this point, there is still no proof that they have any hubs. Vegaswikian (talk) 18:50, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

I wouldn't be surprised either, but all of the hubs were different colors. Doing a Yahoo search, various sites called them focus cities, hubs, and bases. There is no site that can straight-up call them hubs or focus cities. Have you emailed a G4 representative? I think it can best be resolved by contacting the company.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

21:09, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

The problem with discussing this with G4, is that we need reliable sources. That means something that is in the public record. Getting the information on the phone or in an e-mail does not cut it. So without sourcing that meet WP:RS calling any of these hubs should be changed back to focus cities. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:51, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

I see your point. Here are some links I found however: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], and finally the search itself: [6].

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

01:52, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Still no reliable sources. In fact several of those links say there is no hub. Vegaswikian (talk) 02:14, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

I think it would be more appropriate to refer to them as focus cities (as they are on the G4 page) considering they don't offer any connecting service. I'm removing it from the airport articles. Sorry for any inconvenience,

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

13:51, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

MIA= G4 hub

They have aircraft that are based in MIA (don't stay for long, but there are a couple of MD80's that overnight). Why would it not be a hub? I can understand PGD not being a hub as well as MYR because they don't have aircraft that overnight.
-RokinRyan —Preceding unsigned comment added by RokinRyan (talk • contribs) 02:00, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

From the focus city page:
In the airline industry, a focus city is a location that is not a hub, but from which the airline has non-stop flights to several destinations other than its hubs.
Just because aircraft stay overnight there doesn't mean its a focus city. Also, G4 doesn't even serve MIA unless its a Cuban Charter!

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

13:48, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

G4 has aircraft dedicated to its MIA hub. Maybe to end this arguement, why doesn't someone add a focus city list to G4's page.
RokinRyan (talk) 00:39, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Please see these links: [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], and [13]. None of them list MIA as anything important to G4. There is a focus city list in G4's page. The only reason there are aircraft based at MIA is because they are only used for flying to Cuba. No mainline service to MIA. Having aircraft overnight is no indicator of a hub. Say a flight on F9 flies from DEN to DTW, arriving at midnight. The aircraft then must stay overnight at DTW, for passengers to board the plane again at 6:30 AM to fly back to DEN. Yes the F9 plane stayed overnight at DTW, but DTW isn't a hub or focus city for F9. Hub or focus city can only be indicated by number of destinations served from the airport, or frequency of flights to an from the airport.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

13:05, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Tunica is a base, yet it also isn't on the route map. A base is a base is a base. RokinRyan (talk) 04:39, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Where does it say that Tunica is a base??? Do even have any sources for your claims? I will not even remotely agree that MIA is a focus city for G4 until you can find sources for your claim that they keep aircraft based there. Even then, that is not an indicator of focus city or hub status. As explained above: even though there may be an F9 aircraft overnight at DTW, it still isn't a hub. Do you have any other reasons? Now, UTM can't be a focus city either just because aircraft are based there. In the UTM article it specifically says that the basing of aircraft there is part of the charter contract with Harrah's Entertainment. I wish other editors would comment on the G4 talk page, where I have posted this discussion.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

13:13, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't even get why you would use an example such as F9 in DTW. Maybe other editors don't comment on your G4 posts is because they don't agree with you. RokinRyan (talk) 19:07, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Well its hard for them to comment on them when someone removes them. That was your IP you used to remove it. That could be considered abusive sockpuppetry. And it was an example, I could have used any combination of airline and airport for that, it would have made the same point. Please provide a reliable reference that says that MIA is a hub/focus city for G4. Did you look at the links I provided you? You are beating around the bush so to speak.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

19:41, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

I saw them and removed them because I thought it was creepy that you were copying our conversations. I think it is also creepy that you took the time to see if it was my IP address. Now, please don't talk to me any more. You can respond to this and this only.RokinRyan (talk) 22:30, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

It is relevant to the talk page. Also, this talk page is public, other people can look at this too. And it doesn't take time to figure out that it was your ip, I just looked at your contribs. If you think either of those are creepy, thats part of being on Wikipedia. I'm removing it from the article that MIA is a focus city. You can't provide any refs for that claim, this has wasted too much of my time.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

00:45, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Allegiant Air. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

01:28, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Listen, If Allegiant has planes based @ MIA, what doesn't make that a hub? I am getting tired of this. Let's have it reverted to it having MIA on there. If someone else changes it out, fine. Or we could have someone who runs the website sort this out, it is up to you. RokinRyan (talk) 01:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC

First of all, thank you for discussing this. What doesn't make it a hub is that there are significantly fewer destinations served out of MIA than G4's focus cities. In addition, they are all charters, in a fixed-fee contract with the US government, completely separate from their usual scheduled services. I have asked Vegaswikian (talk · contribs) for their opinion on this discussion.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

01:54, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

I'll leave it up to Vegaswikian (talk · contribs). I just want this to be over, lol. RokinRyan (talk) 02:00, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks all. Let's start with airline hub which says An airline hub is an airport that an airline uses as a transfer point to get passengers to their intended destination. I'll add that while not stated in the intro, cargo flights can also use hubs. There is nothing that I see in there about a hub being based around where aircraft are based. Some airlines don't define any hubs, WN being one. So with 233 departures our of Las Vegas, it is considered a focus city and not a hub. They also overnight a number of planes and based on the last time I talked to a crew, they have crew base there. Now getting back to the question at hand. This simply comes down to what criteria are there for this being a hub? The airline, as far as I can tell does not label any airport as a hub including Las Vegas its 'base' and largest operation (I think). Our definition of a focus city is a location that is not a hub, but from which the airline has non-stop flights to several destinations other than its hubs.

So, lacking any reliable sources that MIA or any other airport is a hub, I would say that it is not a hub. I will add that this week I did scan a few of the 10K and similar reports to see if they considered LAS as a hub and could not find support for any hubs. So in my opinion there are no hubs that G4 uses. One other point to consider. G4 runs only direct flights. If you fly into PHX or LAS and are continuing to another location, you need to deplane, get your checked luggage and then check in for the next flight. That pretty much says that they don't use hubs. And finally charters are a special case and I see no way where those aircraft are based could be considered as a hub. As a base, maybe, but not a hub or a focus city. Hope this helps. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:04, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! I have gone in and changed the article.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

12:47, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

You might want to change the artice again. It still has Miami and Charlotte County listed in the first paragraph as a focus city. RokinRyan (talk) 16:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Already taken care of.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

22:30, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

An exciting opportunity to get involved!

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 00:44, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

 Done I've joined.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

12:48, 23 August 2009 (UTC)

Contest update

Well, it's just 1 day until the contest begins, so I thought I'd check in with everyone and make sure you're all ready to go. First I'd like everyone to check out the main contest page and read over the rules and the scoring system. If you have any final questions or concerns, make them known on the talk page. Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Contest/History/2009 is the scoreboard that will be updated, you can watchlist it. Check out Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Contest/Submissions which shows how your submission page should look. Another example is at Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Contest/Submissions Example, and your personal page should be listed at the footer of the page, which is also at Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Contest/Users. Again, take any questions to the contest talk page.

Good luck! - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 20:57, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the reminder. I'm on vacation until the 5th of September. Thanks,

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

23:11, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Contest scoring change

I've realized there may be an issue with the scoring system, and I have a solution, which I've explained here. Feedback is requested. - Trevor MacInnis ^contribs 23:55, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Stubs

I see you are making stubs about San Diego neighborhoods. First, have you considered instead working to improve List of neighborhoods of San Diego, California? It's not in very good shape, and it would be much more useful to a reader to be organized by region there instead of having lots of little stubs that don't provide much more information. Who knows, someday it could be a WP:Featured List! Second, please be sure you actually have the correct source in the stubs. Roseville-Fleetridge, San Diego, California is referenced to northern, but it's actually in western. Others of these short articles may also point to the wrong source. Thanks, Reywas92^Talk 22:21, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

I fixed the Roseville-Fleetridge errors and the others.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

22:25, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

I'd prefer to continue creating these stubs in the hope that they will be expanded, every article starts as a stub. I will improve the list when I finish creating the stubs. I would appreciate if you could check over them for errors. Thanks,

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

23:47, 14 September 2009 (UTC)

Well, I see that you're relatively new here, and in my experience, these will not be expanded. If the creator is not going to take the time to make good articles about not-really-notable topics when he starts, they will never grow at all. These are just very short stubs that will likely stay that way. Also, if the only reference for these is a website that just lists the names with a map, then it does not pass WP:Notability. You need multiple, significant references, not just one passing mention. My policy is not to create a new article unless there's actually enough information to need one. With these sizes, a merged list would be more beneficial to the reader. I can guarantee you that with just a little work in creating a table, the main list of the neighborhoods can become fantastic and you won't need an article for each individual one at all. Happy editing, Reywas92^Talk 01:52, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

If you really would much rather have the info on the list, you can nominate them all at WP:AFD and move what's on the pages onto the list. Additionally, that reference is all that is needed for the information that is on the page. I will not continue to add more stubs yet.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

19:33, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

I will continue to add stubs, as some such as La Playa, San Diego, California are being expanded, and you have not responded swiftly enough.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

19:28, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Fine then, but even at that length I prefer having a single page for this information. Otherwise perhaps divided into four or five articles by region. Reywas92^Talk 22:24, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Delta Shuttle

How do we handle the Delta Shuttle flights? 74.183.173.237 (talk) 21:38, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

How so and in what context?

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

22:13, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Like Delta Shuttle operated by Delta Air Lines, Delta Shuttle operated by Shuttle America, or do we treat them as if they were mainline flights? I know the flights operated by Shuttle America should be listed as "Delta Connection". 74.183.173.237 (talk) 22:16, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Reading the DL Shuttle article I would refer to them as DL Shuttle operated by DL and DL Shuttle operated by Shuttle America. Like DL Connection, we refer to it as the brand name operated by the specific airline. In this case DL does operate for the DL Shuttle brand name with an MD-88.

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

23:41, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

A dispute tag was added to the respective airports serving the Shuttle flights...we'll leave it listed as it is for now until any others disagree. Thanks! 74.183.173.237 (talk) 00:39, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Also, I have started a discussion here regarding the listing of the flights. I'd appreciate your comments. 74.183.173.237 (talk) 04:33, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

San Diego neighborhoods

My pleasure; thanks for starting these. My interest is in Point Loma so I may not attempt much with the other neighborhood pages you created. BTW there is a big discussion going on right now whether to change the style "Sunset Cliffs, San Diego, California" to something simpler, perhaps "Sunset Cliffs (San Diego)." It's located here if you're interested. --MelanieN

Thanks Melanie. I do notice that you and other editors have added information on what neighborhoods are commonly called, or that they are actually two different neighborhoods. For instance, I just redirected Park West to Bankers Hill after you added that it is commonly known as Park West. I live near Detroit, and do not know these things, I have been creating these articles purely based on the single reference provided in the articles I created. Could you please provide a list of things that should be changed? i.e. giving Fleetridge its own article, separate from Roseville. Thanks,

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

15:16, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

IP making DL/NW changes

Can you keep an eye on IP 76.95.138.32, who has been changing NW flights to Delta to many airport article (most Asian airports) as the two carriers are still operating seperately. I reverted his edits but I think he will continue to change more. Thanks! Snoozlepet (talk) 00:56, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Universal Church Triumphant of the Apathetic Agnostic

A tag has been placed on Universal Church Triumphant of the Apathetic Agnostic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 02:39, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

RE: Userfy deleted page request

As per your request [14], the deleted article Universal Church Triumphant of the Apathetic Agnostic has been userfied to User:Ishwasafish/DLNWE. Please source and cite the article to reliable, third-party, published sources so that it meets the notability requirements for organizations. Once this has been completed, you may move it out of namespace and back into the main article space. Good luck! — Kralizec! (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks!

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

21:43, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

BOS and LAX added as DL hubs

An IP adding them to the hub information at the Delta page. Nowhere is mentioned that those are indeed hubs. Besides, Delta has 10 hubs: the 4 pre-merger DL hubs (ATL, CVG, SLC, and JFK), the 5 hubs from Northwest (DTW, AMS, MSP, MEM, and NRT), and the new hub at LGA. Regards! Snoozlepet (talk) 03:50, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

DL operated by NW flights

Hey. I have started a discussion at WP:AIRPORTS and WP:AIRLINES regrading the listing of "Delta operated by Northwest" flights. Apparently, people are beginning to wanted to list the flights as "DL operated by NW". Regards! Snoozlepet (talk) 14:25, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification,

Ishwasafish ^{click here!!!}

21:24, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Nwflight253.jpg

An article that you have been involved in editing, Nwflight253.jpg, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nwflight253.jpg. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. I3409234 (talk) 20:07, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Nwflight253.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nwflight253.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. I3409234 (talk) 00:41, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Aviation Contest

Hi Ishwasafish! This note is to inform you that your Aviation Contest submissions page has been archived from the previous round! You are now free to add submissions for this round! Note: This next round will run from January through February, so feel free to update your submission page with work from both months! Thanks, and happy editing! (Note: I will not be watching this space. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Contest discussion page. -SidewinderX (talk) 14:03, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Assession

The pages you posted on Wikiproject Michigan have been assessed a little while ago and the assessor did not post, so I thought I'd let you know. Jacob S. ^grafitti 07:00, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Amusement Park WikiProject

Hello Ishwasafish. Recently, the Amusement Parks WikiProject was reformatted and revived. As part of this process other related WikiProjects (such as Disneyland, Herschend Family Entertainment, Universal Parks & Resorts and Walt Disney World) were also revived and have now become part of the Amusement Park WikiProject as task forces. If you would like to remain listed as a member on these WikiProjects please re-add your name to the appropriate lists at the participants page. All names currently on the list have been cleared. If you have any queries, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. Thank you for your cooperation, Themeparkgc  Talk  08:21, 6 November 2010 (UTC).

Orphaned non-free image File:Arcade Fire - The Suburbs (8 covers).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Arcade Fire - The Suburbs (8 covers).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 15:13, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, Ishwasafish! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 18:01, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

USRD WikiProject Newsletter, Winter 2012

Volume 5, Issue 1 • Winter 2011 • About the Newsletter
This edition is going out to all USRD WikiProject members (current, former, or potential) in addition to other subscribers as part of a roll call to update the participants list. Anyone that would like to continue to receive this newsletter in the future needs to update the subscription list if they are not already subscribed.
Departments Assessment roundup Portal selected articles and pictures	Features U.S. Roads consolidates M-6 article makes headlines Planning Department debuts Stub drive concludes early, successfully Editorial	State and national updates Project news Task force reports for MD, MI, PA, and VA
Archives • Newsroom • Full Issue • Shortcut: WP:USRD/NEWS

—Imzadi 1979 → 22:05, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Photo requests

Hi! Do you take photo requests in Michigan? WhisperToMe (talk) 15:49, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Quixotic plea

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 06:29, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:40, 8 November 2016 (UTC)