Mjal

Please sign your messages using ~~~~. This will produce the correct name and date/time, because you signed Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/4836.03 as MJAL and there is no such user since the name is case sensitive. Also signing "as nominator" is of course only performed by the nominator, you can choose to sign "per nominator" Dr Debug (Talk) 21:51, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

But the most important thing is that you are:

Welcome!

Hello, Mjal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Dr Debug (Talk) 21:51, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

THANKS

Thank you for your advice

You're welcome ;) Don't forget the ~~~~ Dr Debug (Talk) 22:16, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

my rfa

thanks for the wupport vote on my rfa :)Benon 22:35, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

All the RfAs

Hi, Mjal. I see that you have voted in a lot of RfAs, even though you seem from your contributions to be an inexperienced user. I don't mean to devalue your votes, but do you know anything about the candidates, and about what admins do? Have you perhaps contributed from a different account before? Bishonen | talk 02:06, 3 February 2006 (UTC).

Mjal, I would recommend that you thoroughly review the RFA candidates and their history, instead of adding 20 support votes within a half hour span. I personally don't believe that you can come to conlusions for 20 different users so quickly in a responsible manner. Cheers. --Madchester 07:30, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

To tell you the truth its really quite easy you simply read the paragraph about the candidate and their answers to the question that were asked. Instead of looking for the number of edits I trust the number that was given by the candidate or the individual that nominated them, I sure if there were lying about their edit count someone would expose them relatively quickly. USER:Mjal 15:12, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Actually RFA success isn't solely determined by edit counts.... Per WP:GRFA#What RfA contributors look for, other qualities such as varied experience, helping with RC patrols, AFDs, and regular user interaction are as important for evaluating potential RFAs. Please keep that in mind, edit counts aren't the best indicator of a user's experience on Wikipedia. --Madchester 19:06, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

This is exactly the point I've been trying to make but in terms of user interaction that could only be evaluated if I had worked on or with that individual on Wikipedia. Mjal 19:11, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Actually you can easily obeserve user interaction by reviewing a user's edit history, especially on talk pages. Even if I've never worked with a particular RFA nominee, I always check up on the user's talk page to see how they interacted with other members of the Wikipedia community. If you're going to be voting for someone on an RFA, the least you can do is take some thought and effort evaluating their past efforts and communication, before giving them a vote. We have to be respectful of the policies on Wikipedia (comme WP:GRFA) to ensure that they remain valid among the community.--Madchester 20:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

YES

I used to edit and creat pages during school hours as an anonymous user for about a year. I stop doing this because some students from my school vandalized a page on wikipedia and thus got the schools IP was banned. I was then forced to work on wikipedia from home and just recently I began editing useing my account.

Request for edit summary

Thank you for your contributions. And I have a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries more often when you contribute. An edit summary helps others understand what you changed when checking the watchlist or the recent changes, and often times complements studying the diff. Think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. I hope you don't mind. :) Cheers – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 15:58, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

WP:AAP

I reverted your additions to that page. Instead, please look here: Wikipedia:How to create policy. NSLE _(T+C) 00:52, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

I couldn't help looking in, since I still have your talk page on watchlist. If the official page on policy is too hard, you can always use the simple guideline:

How Wikipedia Actually Creates Policy

• Step 1. Have an idea. Make a page about it.
• Step 2. Tell everyone you know a billion times. Tell everyone you don't know a billion times.
• Step 3. Get a few people to agree with you. Call it a consensus. Slap a {{policy}} tag on there.

Alternate Method

• Step 1. Find a policy that's faulty
• Step 2. Blantantly ignore it, advertise your civil disobedience if wished. Be nice while doing so.
• Step 3. Until people give you a compromise or real world reason to stop, just don't. The winner is the person who edits the most without breaking WP:3RR or WP:CIVIL

Copied from: User:Karmafist/wikiphilosophies

Cheers ;) Dr Debug (Talk) 18:23, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

RFA

Hi, just wanted to thank you for voting on my RFA, which went through with a count of (58/0/1), far better than I'd expected. I intend to take things slowly and start using the extra abilities gradually, but if there's anything I can do just leave a message. Cheers, CTOAGN (talk) 13:54, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you for your support on my request for adminship. It ultimately succeeded with votes of 52/1/2, so I am now an administrator. Should you have any questions, comments, complaints, or requests at any point in the future, please do not hesitate to let me know on my talk page or via e-mail.

—bbatsell ¿? 05:20, 8 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your support on my request for adminship. It ultimately failed with votes of 3/21/1. Should you have any questions, comments, complaints, or requests at any point in the future, please do not hesitate to let me know on my talk page or via e-mail.

Yeltensic42 don't panic 19:35, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you Hello Mjal, and thank you for your support in my request for adminship! It passed with a final count of 63/4/3. I am honoured by the community support and pledge to serve the project as best as I can. CanadianCaesar The Republic Restored 16:35, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for supporting my RfA. It was successful and I hope to be a good administrator. Essexmutant 11:46, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

File:Plunger 250x410.jpg

Thanks for taking the time to vote in my RfA, which passed with a final vote of 54/2/1 despite my obvious inadequacy for the job. I'll do my level best to use the mop and bucket — or, as I said in my RfA, plunger — responsibly. Of course, in the best tradition of politicans everywhere, I've already broken a campaign promise (I blocked a vandal last night despite having said "I don't anticipate using the blocking tool very often"). Nevertheless, I'll try not to let the unbridled power corrupt me. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 14:56, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

Hello Mjal, thank you for you support in my RfA. I was promoted with a final count of 48/1/0! If you see me making any mistakes, let me know ASAP. -- WB 02:20, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

WP:RFA/Quarl

Hi Mjal, thanks for your support in my RFA, which succeeded. If I can ever improve or help in any way, please let me know! :) —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-02-16 11:45Z

RFA Thanks!

Thank you! Hello Mjal, and thank you for your support in my request for adminship! It passed with a final count of 98/2/0. If there is anything I can do to help you, please leave me a message on my talk page! -- xaosflux Talk

Thank you!

Thank you very much for your support during my recent Admin election, I appreciate the trust that you have put in me. Please contact me if you have any questions, comments or concerns regarding my work as an admin.

Kind Regards, Elf-friend 09:00, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you!

Thank you!

Hi Mjal. On behalf of my right eye, I'd like to thank you for giving me your support on my recent RfA. It ended with a final tally of (73/2/2) and therefore I have been installed as an administrator now, and I'm ready to serve Wikipedians all over the world with my newly acquired mop and bucket. If you have any questions, do not hestitate to forward them to my talkpage. Once again, thanks for your support. SoothingR 20:16, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

Thanks for your vote My request for adminship passed with a final result of 78/2/0. Hopefully I will live up to everyone's expectations. Please ask if I can ever help out with anything in the future. Martyman - 09:37, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you for your support of my request for adminship. I'm delighted that the RfA ultimately succeeded with a final consensus of 52/1/0, so I am now an administrator. If you ever have any comments regarding my editing, or I can help you at any point in the future, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Again, thank you!

_└ ^UkPaolo/_talk^┐ 11:02, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Blocked IP

I don't know what you're talking about; I'm not an administrator. Yeltensic42 don't panic 22:00, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

User:198.20.32.254

A review of the block log does not indicate that I've placed any blocks on this IP address, and that most of it's blocks have been for a short duration. If you contest a block made by one of the administrators, you may want to contact them directly. If you have information from the ISP holder of this IP in how they may want to deal with their end users that are vandalizing the encyclopedia so as not to hinder legitimate editors, you may want to post it on that user talk page as well. Thank you. xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 22:32, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

RFA

Thank you for supporting me in my successful RFA. Please drop a note on my talk page, should you need assistance with anything, or have questions about any of my actions. -Kmf164 (talk | contribs) 00:28, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

Thanks for voting! Although this is a bit late in coming, I want to thank you for voting (no matter what your vote was) in my recent request for adminship. You might be aware that it did not pass due to a lack of consensus. The final tally was 21/9/10. I think I will try again this spring or summer after I have gained a bit more experience and met a few more fellow editors. Thanks again!

--MatthewUND^(talk) 05:34, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

With apologies for the impersonal AWB-ness of the message... Thanks for your support on my recent request for adminship. It passed at 91/1/0, and I hope I can continue to deserve the community's trust. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help you, and if I make a mistake be sure to tell me. My talk page is always open. (ESkog)^(Talk) 02:32, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your voting!

Thanks!

Hi, thanks for your voting on my RFA. It has finished with the result 88/14/9, and I am promoted. I am really overwhelmed with the amount of support I have got. With some of you we have edited many articles as a team, with some I had bitter arguments in the past, some of you I consider to be living legends of Wikipedia and some nicks I in my ignorance never heard before. I love you all and I am really grateful to you.

If you feel I can help you or Wikipedia as a human, as an editor or with my newly acquired cleaning tools, then just ask and I will be happy to assist. If you will feel that I do not live up to your expectation and renegade on my promises, please contact me. Maybe it was not a malice but just ignorance or a short temper. Thank you very much, once more! abakharev 07:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Remember to always sign all of your posts on talk pages. Typing four tildes after your comment ( ~~~~ ) will insert a signature showing your username and a date/time stamp, which is very helpful. Yankees76 19:43, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

I just wanted to say thank you for voting for my RFA, of course if you ever need a hand, let me know :) - cohesion★talk 00:01, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

My RFA

Thank you for supporting my successful request for adminship. I'll try to put the admin tools to good and responsible use. If I do anything wrong you know where to find me. Raven4x4x 07:37, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

Hi! Thanks for your support in my request for adminship (did you know that "adminiship" is not an English word? Unbelievable!). It ended with a tally of (51/0/0). As an administrator, I hope to better help this project and its participants: if you have any question or request for help, please let me know. - Liberatore(T) 12:06, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you for your support in my request for adminship. I'm delighted that the RfA succeeded with a final consensus of 52/17/7, and receiving comments including having 'excellent potential to become a great moderator', and I am now an administrator. It did however only just pass, and I shall do my very best to rectify any of my errors, including the general belief that I should do more article work. If you have any concerns, or if you ever feel that I may be able to help you, please feel free to leave a message on my talk page. Again, thank you!

Ian13/talk 19:55, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for your support of my RfA

Thank you for your support of my successful request for adminship. I am honoured that the nomination was supported unanimously and that the community expressed confidence that I would use the tools wisely. If you have any concerns please let me know on my talk page. Regards A Y Arktos 02:48, 5 March 2006 (UTC)

RFA Thanks

Thank you! Thank you for your support in my recent RFA. It passed 53/1/2 and I am now an administrator. I appreciate that some of you made exceptions to your usual requirements re length of service and so on because we've interracted positively in the past, or because of my credentials, so I will endeavour to use my new mop cautiously. I'm always open to feedback and gently constructive criticism. If you're not an admin and need some assistance do of course please let me know. Thanks again --kingboyk 00:23, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

P.S. If you are interested in The Beatles, User:Lar has asked me to tag on a little note advertising the creation of a new Beatles WikiProject that we are currently setting up. Please sign up and help.

RfA/Christopherlin

Thank you for your support on my recent RfA. It didn't go through this time (22/11/8), but there's always another time. --Christopherlin 17:09, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Re : Nomination for adminship for (aeropagitica)

Hello! Thank you for taking the time to vote for me in my recent request for adminship It ended successfully with a final score of (40/10/5). I value all of the contributions made during the process and I will take a special note of the constructive criticism regarding interacting with users in the user talk space. If you have questions or requests, please leave a message.  (aeropagitica)  17:12, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

My RFA

Thanks for your support in my RFA. The final vote count was (66/2/3), so I am now an administrator. Please let me know if at any stage you need help, or if you have comments on how I am doing as an admin. Have a nice day! Stifle 17:02, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

This user thinks it is ironic that thanks for supporting Cyde's successful RFA came in the form of a userbox.

Here's a userbox for you. --Cyde Weys 04:24, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

I'm leaving this macrophage, a particularly hungry white blood cell on your talk page, I just finished a rewrite of its article and realized they're not so different from administrators, as they keep their surroundings clean, doing away with anything that's not supposed to be there...
Anyway, with that short lecture on cell biology done with, I'd like to thank you for your vote on my RfA, which passed with (49/2/0), I'll do my best to not let you down, and if you see me heading towards a common newbie mistake, please nudge me in the right direction :)

--Obli (Talk)^? 20:36, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

JDoorjam's RfA

Thank you! Hey Mjal, thank you for your support in my RfA: it passed with a final tally of 55/1/2. If you want a hand with anything, please gimme a shout. Again, thanks! – JDoorjam Talk 21:40, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

My RfA

Hey Mjal, how is it going? Thank you for supporting my Request for adminship! It passed with a final vote of 73/1/1, which means that I have been granted adminship! I look forward to using these tools to enhance and maintain this wonderful site. I will continue regular article/project contributions, but I will also allocate a sizable portion of my wikischedule toward administrative duties :) Thanks again, and if you have any questions/comments/tips, please let me know! — Deckiller 04:39, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Reminder

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --Deenoe 00:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

RfA Thanks

Thank you very much for participating in my RFA, which closed successfully earlier this week with a result of (50/3/0). If you have any further questions or suggestions, feel free to write me. I hope I will live up to your trust. Michael 19:30, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Hey Mjal, thank you for supporting my recent RfA. It finished with an amazing final tally of 160/4/1. I really appreciate your support. Cheers, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 11:23, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Thank you...

...for your support of my recent RfA. If I can ever be of any service, just drop me a line. Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 19:48, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

RFA thanks from Mike

Thank you for your Support on my recent RfA, which I withdrew at 16/20/4. The criticism I received will hopefully result in me learning becoming a better editor, and thanks again for your support! — Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 23:51, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA discussion! I appreciate you contributing your voice to the debate and its outcome. I hope how I wield the mop makes you proud. Thanks!

— Saxifrage

Thank you for your support!

Se la face ay pale, la cause est... Se la face ay pale, la cause est... 23:42, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

If I'm a bit pale in the face now, it's because of the amazing support during my recent request for adminship and because of all those new shiny buttons. And if in the future my use of them should not always be perfect please don't hesitate to shout at me any time, sunset, noon or sunrise.

Thanks

Hi Mjal, thanks for your support to my RFA. Do let me know if I can be of any assistance -- Lost^(talk) 17:55, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

RfA thanks!

My brand-spankin' new mop!

My RfA done I hope to wield my mop well (Her name is Vera) I appreciate The support you have shown me (I hope I don't suck) Anyway, I just wanted to drop you a line (damn, haikus are hard)

EVula // talk // ☯ // 17:06, 11 November 2006 (UTC)