PermanentVacay

Larry Hama

Hi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Regarding your change of the Infobox photo, I do not agree with my friend and colleague, Tenebrae, in that I do not believe there is anything wrong with changing a photo unilaterally, as I change photos unilaterally all the time. My problem is that there doesn't seem to have been cause for the change, nor did you include any explanation, or any edit summary at all, which is expected of editors. No offense, but your photo is more poorly lit than the one already in the article, it's more out of focus, and Larry Hama is not facing the camera. If you disagree, we can start a discussion on the article's talk page, so let me know. In the mean time, I noticed that your pic was not categorized on the Commons, so I went and added it to the Larry Hama category. If you have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 21:35, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

I do consider Nightscream a valuable colleague and one of WikiProject Comics' best editors. On this one matter, he and I respectfully disagree. My take remains that for anything as important as replacing an infobox image, discussion is of paramount importance. Indeed, discussion is the very lifeblood of Wikipedia. Regardless, both Nightscream and I are always willing to help other editors, and we hope you'll stick around and, certainly, avail yourself of us and of Wikipedia's many other resources. Happy Wiki'ing! --Tenebrae (talk) 03:23, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi Nightscream. I'm not sure if you read this or not. Thank you very much for your helpful input - it's a matter of aesthetics. The reason I replaced the pic is a personal preference (not mine alone) for non-posed photos - what I posted was a shot of Hama looking more enthused mid-conversation... but your lighting issues are valid as well. This one is also a more recent photo. Anyway, I don't want to fight over something like this, it seems silly. Also, thank you for 'assisting' a newbie and not 'biting' me. BTW, I thought I had entered some text for the change but I guess in pasting the file name it got lost. PermanentVacay (talk) 04:04, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Tenebrae, Nightscream is right that your attitude was very much in the spirit of how outsiders see wikipedia - you made a claim that, as far as I can still see, is not backed up by wikipedia policy. You used the royal 'we' to refer to your own personal beliefs regarding policy. It was very upsetting for me to see you revert that change so quickly - it did not seem like you were interested in assisting, and by your tone it did seem like you thought I was new. Do you not think that this is what happened? PermanentVacay (talk) 04:04, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

There's not a policy or guideline for every one of a thousand different things an editor can do. I believe very much that major changes should be discussed; I do this myself: See Talk:Doctor Strange, for instance, or Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Notice board/Requested moves/2011. Personally, I find it egoistic and not in the best interests of Wikipedia for users to insert poorly photographed images simply because they shot them. I'm sorry if this appears blunt, but judging from your own comment to me above, that appears to be the level of discourse you use and appreciate. I reiterate that I, and I'm sure any Wikipedia editor, would be happy to help in any way if asked. --Tenebrae (talk) 15:10, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

The Encyclopedia Project

This new article needs several third-party reliable sources to establish that it meets our notability requirements. Sources affiliated with the subject and simple event listings are not sufficient coverage to establish notability. Unless notability can be established, it is likely that the article will be deleted sooner or later. Yworo (talk) 20:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Encyclopedia Project

The article The Encyclopedia Project has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links:
The Encyclopedia Project – news, books, scholar
Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnInDC (talk) 01:03, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Grant Morrison photo

Hi. Your opinion on what would be the best photo for the Infobox in the Grant Morrison article is requested here. If you could take the time to participate, it would be greatly appreciated, but if you cannot, then disregard; you don't have to leave a note on my talk page either way. Nightscream (talk) 01:28, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Burnt Sugar photo

Thanks for adding a photo to the article about Burnt Sugar! — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 05:48, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:ChicoGsh.png

Thanks for uploading File:ChicoGsh.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:12, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Lafrae Olivia Sci for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lafrae Olivia Sci is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lafrae Olivia Sci until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 17:04, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Pet Bottle Ningen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Stone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Ben Templesmith

Hi. can you offer your opinion in this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:37, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Chico article

Thanks for creating the Chico article, just added a photo. Regards --Goldsztajn (talk) 06:07, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Greg Pak

Hi. I just uploaded my pics from the September 9 Greg Pak signing, at which he had regrown his beard. I made sure to take some "angled" shots, because I know you prefer those. Can you tell me which ones you think would be best for the Infobox? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 05:04, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Okay, I see now you haven't edited since October 6. I've selected one of the "candid" shots over one of the "portrait" shots (or "mug shots", as you called them), since you and others indicated during the previous discussion that you preferred those. (Ironically, one of the two portrait shots I took, he's not really smiling in one, and the one in which he is smiling is out of focus). If you don't like the I chose, we can discuss it when you return. Happy Holidays. :-) Nightscream (talk) 22:48, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Chris Claremont photo

Hi. Can you offer your opinion in the discussion on whether to include a 1990s photograph of Chris Claremont in his article? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 22:33, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Photo consensus discussion

Hi. Can you offer your opinion on the matter discussed at the bottom of this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:16, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Photo consensus discussion at Talk:Mark Millar

Hi. Can you offer your opinion regarding an Infobox photo here? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 06:55, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Photo consensus discussion at Talk:Rick Remender

Hi. Can you offer your opinion regarding the Infobox photo discussion here? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 19:13, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Anderson Henderson White may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ], [[Paula Henderson]] of [[Burnt Sugar]] and [[Melvin Van Peebles wid Laxative]], and [[Jim White (drummer]|Jim White]] of the [[Dirty Three]]. Formed in June 2013, their debut performance was described as "''an

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:24, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Anderson Henderson White

The article Anderson Henderson White has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. — kikichugirl ^inquire 01:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reverend Vince Anderson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Time Out (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Infobox photo consensus discussion

Hi. Can you offer your opinion on which photo would be better for the Rebecca Housel Infobox in this discussion? If you are unable to, I understand; you don't have to reply to this message. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 03:36, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Infobox Photo Discussion

Hi. Can you offer your opinion in this discussion regarding the better photo for an article Infobox? Thanks, and Happy Holidays. Nightscream (talk) 23:51, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Donewithcd.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Donewithcd.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 09:05, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Wil Wheaton photo discussion

Hi. Can you offer your opinion in the consensus subthread of this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 18:20, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Infobox photo discussion

Hi again. Happy New Year. Can you offer your opinion on which photo is better for the Infobox here? If you're not able to participate, just disregard this message; you don't have to message me. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 01:07, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sweet & Sara

The article Sweet & Sara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:59, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your opinion is requested

Hi. Can you offer your opinion on which photo is better in this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:08, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Infobox photo discussion

Hi. Can you offer your opinion on which of two photos is preferable in this discussion? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 15:45, 24 February 2020 (UTC)