Phibeatrice
A barnstar for you!
editThe Teamwork Barnstar | |
Thanks for your work on the Sundance film! Fuzheado | Talk 20:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC) |
Welcome!
editHello, Phibeatrice, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}}
on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Ocaasi t | c 21:41, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
Charlie Chan is Dead: An Anthology of Contemporary Asian American Fiction moved to draftspace
editThanks for your contributions to Charlie Chan is Dead: An Anthology of Contemporary Asian American Fiction. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ae245 (talk) 07:11, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 26
editHi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free Press. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Your many recent creations
editHi there, Phibeatrice, and thank you for your many recent contributions on literature. I've been looking through them, reviewing and rating where necessary, and am happy to see that under your Itools listing, you now have over 40 articles in Start class or higher -- quite an achievement over such a short period. I have also noticed your special interest in women writers and their publications. You may therefore be interested in joining WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to improve the coverage of women on the English Wikipedia. You can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 15:31, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much for reviewing my pages! It really means a lot. I'll definitely put my name down for the WikiProject.
- Phibeatrice (talk) 17:48, 6 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for signing up and welcome to Women in Red. In connection with your future biographies of women, you might find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:41, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
Women in Red November 2024
editWomen in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
Bold, italics, and nesting tags
editThank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that recently in several articles, for example Mild Vertigo, you inserted markup of the form <b><i>...</b></i>
.
- Tags must nest, so this markup should be rewritten as
<b><i>...</i></b>
. - In Wikipedia, it's preferred to mark up italics as
''...''
, bold as'''...'''
, and bold italics as'''''...'''''
.
Cheers! —Anomalocaris (talk) 19:38, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the tip! I will use the preferred bold italics notation in all future articles.
- Phibeatrice (talk) 19:42, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
Articles
editHello Phibeatrice! Thanks for all the articles you've written in the last few days. The articles on literature and music are well researched and written and I really enjoyed reviewing them.
Do be careful about writing about subjects that you might be close to. Some of your biographies are a bit problematic with notability (I've tagged some of them). Sources written by the subject themselves don't count towards notability, as with most sources simply saying that the subject has won an award without biographical coverage or coverage on their work. Feel free to ask me to elaborate on any specific article and I'll give an in depth explanation into it.
I'd like to echo the above that writing so many high quality articles in such a short period of time is quite an achievement. I look forward to reading more of your articles! Ask me anything on Wikipedia if you are confused (ping me!). I'll be happy to help with finding Chinese sources if you don't speak the language. Justiyaya 02:47, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi! Thank you for the feedback. I understand entirely what you’re referring to on some of my pages, and I’ll be sure to exercise stricter discretion on sourcing and notability. That being said, I’m not close to any of the subjects I’ve written about—personally or professionally—so I hope that won’t be a problem. In any case, however, I hear the concerns about notability writ large: I’ll revisit the pages and try to better establish their notability with high-quality, independent sources. I appreciate your note!
- Phibeatrice (talk) 02:54, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
editHi Phibeatrice. Thank you for your work on Murakami T. Another editor, GrabUp, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Clean and amazing, Thanks!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|GrabUp}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
GrabUp - Talk 08:30, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- @GrabUp: Thank you so much! Phibeatrice (talk) 16:28, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Nice work on all the new articles
editNice work on all the new articles | |
Nice work on all the new book articles you've been producing. Keep it up! GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 08:15, 11 November 2024 (UTC) |
- When I was new, somebody gave me this essay Wikipedia:Copyediting reception sections. Hopefully you'll find it as helpful as I do. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 08:16, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! This is very helpful indeed. Phibeatrice (talk) 15:03, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of The Great Reclamation
editHi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Great Reclamation you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:44, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, a human here. There's no special hurry but it would be helpful if you could acknowledge that a complete set of GAN comments has been prepared for you, and indicate your timescale for resolving them. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:12, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 18
editAn automated process has detected that when you recently edited Derek Tran, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Axios.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
The article 128 Lit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Sources cited are blogs, interviews, directories, or the organization itself. Upon searching, I cannot find any additional source material which would demonstrate notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Seraphimblade Talk to me 15:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- The concerns are understood. The page can be deleted. Phibeatrice (talk) 15:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)